Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment some random comments (Score 1) 256

Gut bacteria make a huge difference and they adapt to your diet. There are companies working on transplants, so far it's pretty much consuming excrement... It's the only treatment for some diseases, notably some antibiotic resistant ones. Gut bacteria will change what you consume depending on what they consume and they can change how full you feel based on what they give off (gases...).

Antibiotics kill a lot of gut bacteria so they probably have an impact on weight gain and weight loss. They almost certainly reduce the variety of intestinal flora and that is probably a bad thing.

Recent studies show eating fat does not make you fat. The fat gets broken down and used. Eating sugar makes you fat, it gets stored quickly. Drinking soft drinks (even zero cal zero sugar) makes you fat, don't know why, studies are consistent.

Fruits, vegetables, and exercise are all good.

Walking briskly is good exercise. Walking slowly isn't.

If you want to lose weight: weigh yourself often, cut sugar, exercise. Not necessarily fun, but not bad if you can cook and find sports you enjoy, and/or learn to enjoy walking fairly fast and far.

Comment Deep sigh (Score 1) 993

In most elections Hillary would be someone to avoid. In this case she is the only one actually running, that is the only one who wants the job. Trump is using his free media coverage to continue in the race while siphoning campaign donations into his pockets. The Donald is, as is his trademark, only in the race for what he can steal. If he becomes president he can steal an awful lot. The VP will run the country while Trump loots; he has already made it clear that the VP will handle everything while he "makes America great again," presumably by helping Americans get closer to Jesus via poverty.

And yes, Hillary will be as bad as her husband and probably worse than Obama or Bush I, but she won't steal as much as Trump would or as much as Bush II/Cheney did. I'm not American so I can't vote in any case and my country has elected some kleptomaniacs as well (I'm Canadian, but I think Trump would outsteal Mulrooney, literally stealing massive surpluses into massive deficits). Good luck...

Comment Re:Microsoft's standard annoying programming (Score 3, Interesting) 224

Microsoft has never been consistent on the UI.

Software quality is dropping like a stone with offshoring. You see it from IBM and Oracle too. Lots of bugs, incoherent error messages from someone who just learned that you can trap errors but not how to write English or how to provide different messages for different errors so that the real problem is hidden worse than if nothing had been trapped. Not that everyone onshore is a genius but there is some attempt at HR and technical interviews. Not even lip service once you go offshore, people are cheap and the cost of having crappy coders destroying the code base doesn't seem to figure for non-technical VPs. No end in sight because it's a management fad and outsourcers can bill offshore workers at crazy rates without customer complaints, it's a fad, execs can't knock it without admitting they have no idea what is going on in the companies they "run."

Comment Walking speed? (Score 1) 381

Walking is great exercise if you do it fairly quickly. Walking slowly hardly burns calories at all. I suspect walking makes a significant difference. My weight has varied but my wife grouches at my relative skinniness when we eat fairly similarly similarly, but I walk more and faster, at least when we are not walking together. I suspect hurrying and fidgeting heavily impacts metabolic rate.

On the other hand I totally quit desserts a while back and that made it way easier to lose weight. No soft drinks, no desserts. Food is definitely addictive, though. Reducing sugar was hard. And depressing.

Comment Re:New bands? (Score 1) 361

You think the current generation embraces older music? Kids are humoring you, maybe? Or kids have better taste in your area?

The pre-teens I know through my kid don't voluntarily listen to anything pre-2008 or so and prefer the new star wars stuff. She and most of her friends can't deal with music that isn't electronically altered to keep the singer on key.

I like my kid and many/most of her friends but they pretty much universally prefer the top 100 stuff on the radio. Still pre-teens, though, so maybe they'll grow out of it.

Comment Indeed (Score 2) 407

What employers want is:

Sycophancy. It's much more fun to botch a project with unqualified offshore people who say "we'll work harder next time" instead of with qualified people who say "define the damn business requirements and stick to them if you want us to be done on time." It's hard to tell a qualified techie from a guy off the street with acronyms on his/her CV.

Low salaries. Companies are willing to spend 60 days training and 3 months of work to fail a project offshore that can be done onshore in 3 weeks. It's so much easier to sell cheap people who aren't qualified than reasonable priced people who are. No one knows the difference, especially once the project ends up getting done in 3 weeks once it gets brought back onshore.

A low geekiness factor. It's way more fun to fail a project with guys who are fun and happy than to succeed with a bunch of grouchy nerds.

Promotions without raises. Even at higher levels I'm hearing more and more people who get a title and responsibilities while being paid peanuts relative to people promoted 5 or 10 years ago.

Stock buybacks to inflate options instead of growing the company. Who needs to get better at what you do when you can pillage what someone else built?

Comment Austerity is not a bandaid it is an amputation (Score 1) 342

It's not like austerity is based on anything more than spreadsheet errors (intentional or otherwise), and it's not like it does anything positive for a country.

If you have a family on a fixed salary living within your means is almost always a good idea, at least unless your fixed salary is high enough that you can use Trumponomics.

If you are running a country lowering spending also lowers the GDP (movement of money) and revenues (taxes). Austerity cuts off money you need resulting in more austerityt. You do NOT want to run a country as you run a country or a family budget. Note that this is the reverse of trickle down. Money will get to rich people one way or another but the more steps it takes the better your economy does.

The people pushing austerity, the very rich and the bankers, are not doing this for the good of the countries implementing austerity they are doing it so that they can take money from those countries.

Taxing profits properly, that is making sure that tax on American income is paid in America and tax on UK income is paid in the UK, benefits close to everyone. The only question is the company doing the paying and they potentially benefit from better infrastructure.

Slashdot Top Deals

There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about. -- John von Neumann

Working...