Take a look at the history of GNU TLS. When they started, they managed to repeat pretty much any algorithmic bug OpenSSL and friends made years before. There is little reason to believe that all those shiny new Rust replacements won't have all kinds of bugs yet again.

To be fair, chocolate is one of the few products where the price explosion is largely only cause indirectly by US trade policies. Indirectly in so far as global warming is of course also created by the USA.

The literal expression is used by actual mathematicians that discover solutions, they "found them".

"GPT-5 found solutions to 10 previously unsolved Erdös problems" (quoted from the Twitter post) is IMO pretty clear wording...

I absolutely agree. It's a major difference to find a publication somewhere that was unknown and discovering something independently. It's useful to be able to do the former, but vastly different from being able to do the latter. Not verifying what the computer did is the real embarrassment for OpenAI.

The part that is embarrassing is that they didn't check their sources.

It's useful, but not groundbreaking. The equivalent to a minimal spanning tree in directed graphs is called an optimal branching. The algorithm for that was originally known Edmonds' algorithm in most of the world after the discoverer. It was later discovered that Chu and Liu already published essentially the same idea two years earlier in a Chinese journal. Even now, it is still often referenced only by Edmonds' name. This happens often enough.

OpenAI's tweet was worded to suggest that GPT-5 found something new, when it "just" did a literature (or Google for Gen Z) search. If pulled that kind of stunt in a PHD thesis, it would be revoked post haste.

Maybe because Discovery has literally nothing to do with Houston?

Do you mean the pseudo-dictator that can't make up his mind on whether the world should buy American Goods or not by trying to extort everyone? Let's be real. The reason why Europe has been using Russian Gas was the basic economic argument that nothing was cheaper. Renewables can change that. Nuclear power won't. More importantly, chances are nuclear power is going to add another dependency on foreign powers.

It's funny because the actual teaching of Muhammad were quite progressive for the time, especially when compared to Medieval Europe. But I guess you are just a buzzword triggered conservative as well with no clue how to deal with contradictive nuances...

Overall, Islam is no better or worse than the other Abrahamic Religions. I'd say most flavors of Islams are less vile than a lot of the US-centric "Christian" cults even. Does that mean I want to live in an Islamic country? Heck no. But then I wouldn't want to live in a country with Teleevangelist in power either.

Au contraire! I would call Arnold Schwarzenegger a strongman. Heck, even Vladimir qualifies for that. The man child in the white house just dreams of having any muscles not connected to his jaw...

You misspelled conman.

Are you really pointing to a study based on 10 year old data points?