Comment Yes but they've fixed it (Score 1) 277
I strongly suggest the original poster take advantage of their site and upgrade the installation as they recommend. On December 18th they released a patch
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2000-0 79 .html
which addresses and fixes this problem....
1. Topic:
This errata updates the GNU C library to the latest official release (2.2) while fixing several bugs found in glibc 2.1.92-14 and glibc 2.1.94-3.
2. Problem description:
Users are strongly urged to update to the latest official GNU C library. This library provides binary compatibility with programs and shared libraries built for older releases of glibc, such as glibc 2.0.x and 2.1.x.
Binaries and shared libraries built against glibc-2.1.92-14 or glibc-2.1.94-3 are also binary compatible, but new binaries compiled against this glibc 2.2 might not run on systems with older GNU C library packages installed.
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2000-
which addresses and fixes this problem....
1. Topic:
This errata updates the GNU C library to the latest official release (2.2) while fixing several bugs found in glibc 2.1.92-14 and glibc 2.1.94-3.
2. Problem description:
Users are strongly urged to update to the latest official GNU C library. This library provides binary compatibility with programs and shared libraries built for older releases of glibc, such as glibc 2.0.x and 2.1.x.
Binaries and shared libraries built against glibc-2.1.92-14 or glibc-2.1.94-3 are also binary compatible, but new binaries compiled against this glibc 2.2 might not run on systems with older GNU C library packages installed.
