Comment Hello, IT . . . (Score 1) 366
. . . have you tried turning it off and on again? :-)
Comment Right . . . (Score 1) 154
Meet the new boss—same as the old boss.
Comment Really, Myron? (Score 2) 193
"Mister potato head . . . MISTER POTATO HEAD . . . back doors are not secrets!"
Submission + - Apple v Samsung Jurors Speak, Skipped Prior Art for "Bogging Us Down" (groklaw.net)
eldavojohn writes: PJ over at Groklaw has consolidated some of the more interesting juror comments made following the landmark $1 billion settlement. Apparently the foreman (a patent holder himself) took the jury through the process of how patents work and thus allowed them to return so quickly with a verdict without need of any instructions on how to work through all the material. Most sources are incredulous that all of the information was considered in the process. CNET quote a juror as saying 'After we debated that first patent — what was prior art — because we had a hard time believing there was no prior art, that there wasn't something out there before Apple. In fact we skipped that one so we could go on faster. It was bogging us down.' While the fact that they they voted one way on infringement and another way on invalidity shows they were at least consistent, Groklaw is reporting on some odd inconsistencies in the aftermath of accounts from jurors. The appeal for something this huge goes without question but the accounts collected at Groklaw make this verdict and verdict process sound hasty, ambiguous and probably the result of one man's (the foreman's) personal opinion of patents.
Comment Re:Nuke it from orbit (Score 2) 547
Who says there's an "IT department"? It might be three guys in a basement.
Or two guys and a "relationship manager."
Comment How smart? (Score 1) 663
No, the FCAT measures student achievement. No standardized test would claim or attempt to measure "how smart the students are."
Slashdot Top Deals
All extremists should be taken out and shot.
