Comment Pollution or Nature (Score 0) 449
Once upon time Greenland was a Paradise covered with fruit threes such as orange trees. But now Greenland is one big junk of ice. (I have seen the masses of stoned orange trees in Greenland with my own eyes) Was it pollution that causes the nature to change this once paradise into a bit land of ice?
Once upon time the North and South Pole was in a different place, was it pollution that causes the Poles to change location?
The ice age that we know about, was it caused of humans or could humans stop that ice age to be reality? And can we as humans make the Nature to change its mind, if the Nature is determent to have a new ice age somewhere on planet Earth?
Or is it just Nature it self that is being natural and changing the surface on planet Earth, as it has been doing all the time the Nature has existed?
I agree that we as a part of planet Earth shall not pollute and mishandle Mother Earth. But some times it seams to me that many scientists invent problems, so they can suck funding from the taxpayers, because they don't want to do real science. And bigger the problem is more money they get to play with. Sounds like a modern gold mine for some few. And if the answer is that our so-called pollutions are not a threat to the self-regulating climate, will they tell the taxpayers the real truth? I don't think so because then many scientists would be out of a job and therefore have to do some real work as the rest of us.
Once upon time the North and South Pole was in a different place, was it pollution that causes the Poles to change location?
The ice age that we know about, was it caused of humans or could humans stop that ice age to be reality? And can we as humans make the Nature to change its mind, if the Nature is determent to have a new ice age somewhere on planet Earth?
Or is it just Nature it self that is being natural and changing the surface on planet Earth, as it has been doing all the time the Nature has existed?
I agree that we as a part of planet Earth shall not pollute and mishandle Mother Earth. But some times it seams to me that many scientists invent problems, so they can suck funding from the taxpayers, because they don't want to do real science. And bigger the problem is more money they get to play with. Sounds like a modern gold mine for some few. And if the answer is that our so-called pollutions are not a threat to the self-regulating climate, will they tell the taxpayers the real truth? I don't think so because then many scientists would be out of a job and therefore have to do some real work as the rest of us.
