It's hard to tell with all the general cross subsidization with television service and retention discounts, but then, ISPs have only been regulated under Title II for around two years. Have you seen an actual bill recently that included cable television and Internet service at a decent speed for under $100 per month?

There are only three options here if an ISP wants to remain in business when more and more people are signing up for streaming video services: charge the streaming service for the performance it demands from their network beyond that which was reasonably foreseen, charge the customer directly for the burst traffic like electricity, or charge EVERYONE regardless of whether they use the streaming service or not. Under Net Neutrality, only the third option is actually available; the first now being illegal, and the second one being unacceptable in the marketplace.

I understand the issues perfectly. My financial incentive? Not wanting to see my Internet service bill go up to subsidize those watching Amazon and Netflix, which it MUST if "Net Neutrality" stays.

This is a good thing. It means that Reed Hastings and Jeff Bezos can't shift their costs onto consumers who don't use video services like Netflix. Looks like they'll have to build their own networks, or at least share the cost of provisioning connections capable of delivering uninterrupted streams of multi-megabit-per-second data.

Now, if you want to attack the root cause of the problem with last-mile and monopoly right-of-way access, discriminatory conduct and prohibitions on municipal broadband, be my guest. We already have laws for that.

You can't blame the sugar industry for the extensively peer-reviewed "science" that proclaimed saturated animal fats to be dangerous.

When are the so-called "experts" going to be imprisoned for this fraud which has led to so many deaths due to heart disease and Type II diabetes?

You probably think Pol Pot was a moderate social democrat.

Wealthier and more educated than if we didn't throw somewhere around one trillion dollars annually down the black hole of the left-wing indoctrination-industrial complex? And that's just K12 in the United States.

Considering that certain Irishmen were instrumental in destroying America demographically through the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, I'd say such a demand would be an eminently reasonable one.

...fact that you and your children would be killed if you tried such a thing?

You and your family deserve to be machinegunned in the street outside your home.

The problem is, you define "Nazi" as 'anyone to the right of CNN'.

Your day is coming.

So you want to deny due process to Social Security recipients, and grant it to foreign terrorists and illegal immigrants?

You need to be lynched.

Only because of the mental gymnastics Roberts had to go through. To ordinary sane and honest people though, it's quite obviously unconstitutional.

But since when has black-letter law ever meant anything?

The Constitution specifically forbids direct unapportioned taxes on anything other than income.

The vast majority of those who do the actual fighting in the military are white heterosexual Christian males. What makes you think they will support your side in ANY way, shape or form?

We're working to ensure the survival of Western civilization. Can't do that without nationalism.

Please get mowed down by a truck.