Comment Re:WHAT DOES IS MATTER THAT IT'S A RIP-OFF? (Score 0) 494
It matters because it might/is going to cost him a lot of money that he doesn't have, and could professionally destroy him.
Should Pacman still be under copyright? No, or at least very arguably not after 30 years.
Is Pacman still under copyright? Yes.
Is this copyright infringement UNDER THE RULES AS THEY STAND? Almost certainly
Does that make the author a bad man who deserves punishment? No inference can be drawn.
Is some form of copyright protection necessary in the modern world? Probably; 260 years ago before copyright the investment required to product a work of art was almost entirely personal - and anything substantial was commissioned. Without copyright blockbusters would not exist - you may not regard that as a bad thing, but many people like them.
What can we conclude? He is boned, copyright needs reform.
Is this an original conclusion? Not by a country mile.