over another? i am sure e.coli wasnt picked at random-or pretty sure and some thought went into a working hypothesis at one point or another. very interesting whatever way it is done-all of it

I think this guy is out of his head, and , i think it is a response to his alleged (and settled for $465milliion payback) medicaid/medicare fraud for over billing state payback sources. I know it was back last august or in mid 2016 the company got accused of this type of fraud and called it 'price-gouging' at the time. I only saw a part of the NYT article which indicated gestures and verbiage used by R.Coury who was called chairman or ceo i forget. I am not clear whether it was his reply that started the investigation or whether his reply was after being investigated, and ultimately settled for that reputed $465million us bucks. I am not able to verify this but did read it recently which is why i am out of sync with it all.

I know that State and Feds have catalogued tattoos for decades, they have been used inside the Fed Corrections dept, states too, for tracking gang affiliations. I know for sure that computers have been used with , primitive as it may be, to identify and associate any/all people with certain tattoos with the most aggressive in jail gangs. Those gangs are not contained by the walls and have long been very well established in the communities all over the country. Sharing data has never been a strong point of any Fed or State dept or agency. I only know of the policies on cataloguing tattoos by all police depts and by all correctional institutions upon arrest or admissions. It is another basic part of 'entering the system" and has been for longer than the 8 decades i have been alive. Computers and software make all kinds of applications of all this data simply a matter of what, when , and how. I am guessing, but tattoos may have been recorded or compiled as long or longer than fingerprints. just 2 John