Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:This will end well... (Score 5, Insightful) 146

I'm sure that if they're serious about actually showing that the statistics are useful then we can find 10 random sites who are willing to be 'ethically hacked.'

The astonishing thing is that most people who will read this press release just don't get it, and the depths of their not getting it are even more astonishing...

I am challenging the conclusion, not the data. I believe that they think that they have found vulnerabilities. I suspect they have found a lot of lousy code. No surprise here. 70%, sure. I'll bite off on that number. I'm not arguing with that.

But there is a huge difference between turning a vulnerability into a breach. Let me give you an example. A lot of Cross-Site Scripting attacks let you steal cookies. So they probably found those. But the question is: when you have a cookie, what can you do with it? Can you steal important data? Can you turn that cookie into a breach? Good web sites that use them also tie cookies to your IP address, which means that if you steal my cookie, you got nothing but crumbs. So the point is not that there are these vulnerabilities, but that they have done nothing to show whether these vulnerabilities are truly breachable and able to get an attacker real useful data.

Same for things like directory listing. You can do that to my web site. Is that a security problem? No, in fact, I turned it on specifically. If I didn't want people to read it, I wouldn't have put it on the friggin' web server.

Is a web site that's susceptible to an SQL injection attack hackable? Depends on where you get to inject the code. I'm sure that someone who put their mind to it could take a web site like, say, slashdot, and inject some SQL. Then they might be able to ... well, they could read all those posts that are on the web site. Except they wouldn't be nicely formatted, but real men write HTML with vi anyway. Maybe they could store or corrupt data with the injection, and maybe they couldn't. Maybe (and this is most likely) they could cause the script to blow up. Is that "hacking" a web site? Hell, I get script explosion errors from web sites WITHOUT hacking them.

Is being able to view a script a security vulnerability? it depends. It depends on the web site. The script. The webmaster's intentions.

What percentage web sites actually have data that's worth anything?

So the point is not that they've found a lot of theoretical issues, but whether they've actually found security issues. And the only way, in my mind, to see whether they have is to see if the issues can be exploited. If they can, I'll pay up. If they can't be exploited, then all they've done is made long lists of things that don't matter from a security point of view.

Very long lists.

Slashdot Top Deals

One of the most overlooked advantages to computers is... If they do foul up, there's no law against whacking them around a little. -- Joe Martin

Working...