What is going on with people⦠This is why we cannot have nice things, as someone that champions open source and the benefit of open source with gen AI, this is the Trojan horse of regulation and intervention and will lead to monopolistic practices. There should be 0 tolerance for this material. 1. It is repulsive, and shouldnâ(TM)t be allowed to exist. 2. It is consumed by individuals with a serious mental illness at should not be fed, you donâ(TM)t just open source fentanyl for the junkies to leave you and your family alone. 3. How many images of real children have been augmented and trained by that AI to produce such a picture or image? Even if it was a small amount of trained data, is something learning without the consent of the individual to generate illegal and morally vile images okay? 4. Aside from the obvious no brainer problems with it, for the really dumb people that just cannot get it⦠where does it stop? What is your limit if this does not exceed your limits? What about racist material? What about beastiality? What about hurt core or snuff? Where do you draw the line and how is that line in relation to this material? 5. This needs to stop.

The problem with centralized auth is companies like Okta are lazy dinosaurs that donâ(TM)t adapt. They keep a status quo and rake in overpriced subscriptions and think that their solutions is still valid a decade later. You have to be quick and agile and constantly evolving to do the security thing.

BeyondTrust notified Okta on October 2nd 2023. The same attacked still had access to the support system on October 18th 2023. Part of your job as Okta is to validate and verify false positives not just be like. Well, oh well, we got too many false positives so forget security. The fact that you are spewing such nonsense in these comments make me think a few things. 1 you are really bad at your job and really do not get security. 2 you are Okta HR. 3 you recently signed a deal with Okta for overpriced security and you have sunken cost fallacy invading your sense of reason. Either way, Okta needs to go. The recommendations that their customers provided them should be considered. And if a customer notified you of a breach you should verify and validate, not just throw caution to the wind for a false positive. That sort of false positive mindset is exactly how these things continue. Look at Okta track record, it speaks for itself.

Their customer told them they had a breach. Stop simping for this terrible dinosaur company. There is no excuse for these shameful repeat offenses. Itâ(TM)s not just âoeoh well that is security for youâ. If your customer is telling you that you had a breach, that was a repeat of a recent incident, you deserve to collapse and go bankrupt.

Why use any of the boomer dinosaur companies devices if all itâ(TM)s gonna do is put you on the chopping block when they inevitably get hacked. The company should tank, they should be ashamed of themselves for such knuckle headed foolery.

I've had enough of the banker wars. Dimon and his like should be thrown into the front lines to fight these wars, the money changers will have their due. Watch the VIX, watch all the indicators in the coming weeks for an event to happen. And then financial collapse. The big banks win, the small ones break, but it's always the banks gains and our losses. Brood of vipers.

Or maybe LLMâ(TM)s and tech of that sort werenâ(TM)t meant to be monetized in such a way? Itâ(TM)s not like there are people out there profiting from K-Means or anything. Is OpenAI compensating the people that have researched LLMâ(TM)s over the years?

So openAI can monetize and use other peopleâ(TM)s data for their models but then wants to lock the model from being open source and available and enforce a paywall?