Comment Why is slashdot posting these garbage articles? (Score 5, Insightful) 155
This is a garbage framing of the issue.
The article takes a real demographic fact — birth rates have been falling — and gives the most headline-friendly tech explanation: smartphones. But that is a weak causal story compared with the much more direct variables everyone is living through: housing costs, wage stagnation, student debt, childcare costs, healthcare costs, delayed household formation, and wealth being increasingly captured by the top of the economy.
Yes, smartphones may be associated with reduced in-person socializing or changed dating behavior. But that does not make them the root cause. They could just as easily be a proxy for urbanization, class, education, income, broadband access, cultural change, or other regional differences. AT&T iPhone coverage from 2007–2011 is clever as a study design, but it is still not magic. Coverage maps are not randomly assigned social experiments.
The more plausible causal chain is simpler:
wealth concentrates -> assets inflate -> housing and adulthood become unaffordable -> people delay marriage/children -> fertility falls
Blaming the phone is convenient because it turns a structural economic problem into a consumer-behavior story. It lets everyone avoid the harder conclusion: people are not having fewer kids because Steve Jobs invented the iPhone. They are having fewer kids because stable adult life has become too expensive and too insecure.