Comment Re:trolling trolling trolling (Score 1) 1348
I like where you're going with this but I have to say I prefer this version better
Valve Announces Portal 2 189
eldavojohn writes "Enough rumors, Portal 2 is due out for 2010. Valve also let users know through an announcement on Steam. Game Informer seems to be the de facto provider of Portal 2 information so far. Prepare yourselves for more aperture science! Notice anything funny about the underlined letters in Steam's announcement?"
Comment What about NZ? (Score 1) 134
I just hope us here in NZ don't get stuck with the watered down version.
Comment Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe (Score 1) 259
I still see the L shapes.
Comment Re:And in the Linux world ... (Score 1) 171
Doesn't Debian already do this with Iceweasel..err I mean IceCat?
Comment Re:Suggesting nightlies to regular users?! (Score 1) 412
Nightlies shouldn't be used by those that want to use extensions or avoid crashes
I dunno. I use the nightlies at work... I don't use any extensions though.
+1 Missed the point but still sounded vaguely insightful?
You missed out the 'or' operator. The original statement was that IF (you want to use extensions OR you want to avoid crashes) THEN you shouldn't use nightlies. The followup said that he used the nightlies and avoided crashes just as well as with the stable release, although he didn't use extensions. So: wants to use extensions FALSE, wants to avoid crashes TRUE, and as it turns out nightlies work just fine. Hence OP's theorem is disproved by counterexample.
Really, this is basic Boolean logic. Anyone reading
I think you might mean the 'xor' operator.
