Comment Re:Too integrated (Score 1) 197
It seems every company seeks the holy grail of integrated software. One interface to do everything and time and again the general public ignores these "advances" (anyone remember GEOS?)
Why? Let's look at the latest massively successful "product", Twitter. Summary of twitter: Send 140 Characters to the world. Wow. Stunningly complex (from the user's perspective), huh?
You're right in that every company seeks the holy grail of integrated software, but what's perhaps important here is not the end-user product, in this case. Google is providing an infrastructure and not a holistic product -- it's allowing people to BUILD on a new algorithm, protocol, and structure for the web. Much like the early World Wide Web lead to the break-through of linking and deep linking and what not, there's a whole new structure inherent to the wave. And it will be open source, unencumbered by patents, and people can run their own stuff (sound like the early days of the web?). I read this article on it that makes some pretty good points about where Google may be going. Isn't this a game changer for the Web 2.0 stuff that's come to be quite a bit of what the average person does online?