I'd be curious to see a survey normalize the results to the latitude of the responder. I'm right near the 46th parallel, and the sun was already rising at around 7:50 before the time change. At the latest, it would have been around 8:45 if we stayed in DST, and I'm pretty far towards the eastern edge of my time zone. I hate changing the time, and living in Arizona really cemented that, but I also think it would be absurd to adjust it according to the whims of people who are more minimally impacted by it. Hell, even Chicago has almost 30 minutes more sunlight on their shortest day of the year.
It should be adjusted to keep solar noon from straying too far past local noon at the more northerly latitudes of the continental US, to minimize the population that loses the health benefits of morning sunshine during the winter.
An alternative would be to slant the time zones easterly as you move North, but this would be difficult as you get to states that border the Mississippi, without splitting states between two zones. Personally, I think we should add an additional time zone, slant them easterly, and normalize to DST. But since the first two would never happen, we should just get rid of DST and normalize to standard time.