Anything coming from China was already a running joke in science during the last decade due to the very low quality and made up results that usually accompanied their papers. Nowadays, with the AI generated papers they are spewing out, we just completely disregard anything where the main author's name sounds Chinese.

No, security imbeciles in UK still make you take off your shoes as well. Just happened to me exactly 1 week ago.

A possible explanation is that lower skilled women got these jobs due to gender quotas and diversity hires, and aren't capable of the same work and have the same knowledge of their male counterparts that got in by competing with the best available.

And what is the political bias of the authors of the study?

Sure, it is indeed a lot easier. It's also wrong.

So, what are we getting at here? Close the bars, the dancing, the hugging, showing your face on the street, dining with more than 5 of your friends, never seeing your grandma at the elderly care home, etc, forever?

Simultaneously implementing highly racist face recognition surveillance systems targeting black people, and being highly racist by ignoring black people in face recognition algorithms.

The fact that this guy is in the "ethics" department instead of doing actual work, is a very clear sign that he's not the "smartest AI researcher" around there (at least not anymore).

Lord of the Flies is not simply about "people" trapped in a survival situation, is about "children". Unsupervised children of certain ages, can absolutely be awful to other children, and the only thing keeping them back, is that they will have to respond for it to adults latter on.

Get ready for the Brave New World of open source, where all software is coded by angry obese feminists graduated in Gender Studies.

See, I can understand if a truly conscientious entity wants to avoid people like Gina (I personally don't think what she did is so bad, but fine).

I also accept that most entities (people, companies) understand the world is made in shades of gray, and that we shouldn't go around painting people as monsters just because of some minor actions.

But what truly bothers me, is the sheer, absolute, epic hypocrisy of Disney calling out Gina Carano, while they do all sorts of disgusting stuff to appease China. Things like taking out black characters out of posters in China, because they know there's a true racist sentiment over there. Or like allowing the Chinese Communist Party to veto their script for Mulan, or a number of really, really bad things.

Where I come from, when you beat up the little guy for something bad he did, but you act all meek towards the big ugly, really monstrous big guy, you are labeled as an hypocrite and a coward: That's exactly that what Disney is.

He were so close to a Darwin Award moment here.

What reason do we have to trust the people that create that chart?

Like Obama, Biden is "joining" the Paris Agreement. "Joining", doesn't mean anything, is just some gesture of good will. What every other 1st world nation did at the time when Obama "joined" it, was to actually "ratify" it in a legal binding, that would need to hold even for future presidents. Obama didn't do it, so Trump could just ditch with without any repercussions.

List of people granted executive clemency by Barack Obama: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...