Re:@Home was slower (Score 1)

I had Rogers@Home, then with the Rogers/Shaw swap, Shaw@Home. Speeds were very erratic. At times, I could download 400KB+/s, then at times, it'd be slower than dialup. This happened much more frequently with Rogers@Home. I truly experienced the shared bandwidth issue with overloaded nodes. When Shaw took over for the West, things improved a bit, but I still made the switch over to ADSL. I get consistantly good speeds (usually 100KB+/s to the point of saturating the 1.5Mbps downstream).