Journal jawtheshark's Journal: All nodes are created equal... 15
Recently I started to get bounces, from stuff like gmx.net or writeme.com. I am blacklisted. Why? Not because my server is a relay, of course not! My server is not a relay and is secured as much as I know how to secure a machine. I can cope with not being able to send to gmx.net or writeme.com. No the only reason is that my server is on a DSL line. That's all: DSL == spammer these days. ( Sorbs database marks me as dynamic IP, hence "use ISP mailsever"... fun fun, joy, joy...)
However today my company seems to have implemented exactly the same kind of filter. (this morning, it was stull working) Ayup! I can't send email to my company anymore! Fun, eh? No, I do not have any other email addresses than those hosted by jawtheshark.com or willekens.lu. Why would I? It worked fine for years.
My point is: my node is not equal anymore. Does it mean that I need to have a fix IP address, a company and show my license as "certified mail administrator" to be able to run a mailserver? Well, that's insane: I enjoyed setting up this stuff, I learned a lot. How are future generations going to learn? Go and follow a sendmail course? This cripples the whole idea of an open internet. I guess the spammers have ruined it for us all.
I know there are people that say that my server should not send its own mail but should relay it to my ISP's mailsever. All good and well, but it spoils the whole point of having your own server: lightning fast deliveries, no size-checks on attachements, and especially no point of failure at the ISP. Not that I don't trust my ISP, it's pretty good, but I just like to have my fate in my own hands. Essentially: I now need to reconfigure my sendmail in order that it acts as a glorified mail fowarder. What a waste....
Anyone remembers how to config this? I saw it in discussions on slashdot when in the US some major ISP started to block from popular DSL/Cable services, but I never really wrote it down.
Update
For my future reference: How to route your outgoing mail through your Internet provider's mail servers
Update II Above solution doesn't work. It either strips my domain and replaces it with the one of my ISP (normal, it says "masquerading") or -if I remove options- it just doesn't arrive because my ISP server needs SMTP Authentication. Aaaargh! I don't even know the username and password I have at my ISP for email!
I used to run my own SMTP server once. (Score:2)
Couldn't stand windows 98 crashing on me after a few days of uptime so I stopped in the end, oh those were the days.
Fastmail.fm offer smtp server for 14.95 one off fee. http://www.fastmail.fm/ they might be worth a go.
Re:I used to run my own SMTP server once. (Score:1)
Oh, one off fee? Do you mean "pay once and forget"? Should be looked into, but I still liked the fact that I could send as much as I wanted, and get my email delivered locally here in the apartment on my machine.
Static IP? (Score:2)
Oh, and you want to ignore the "MASQUERADE_AS(yourisp.net)dnl" line in the instructions you linked to. You don't really want allmasquerade, either, otherwise bounce messages won
Re:Static IP? (Score:1)
Try out the link to sorbs and put in the my current IP (80.90.34.
Fixed IP address (Score:1)
ISP email username? (Score:1)
The mail server could be guessed, if they are not nice enough to list it on their website - mail.ispname.com, pop.ispname.com, pop.mail.ispname.com, smtp.ispname.com ...
Re:ISP email username? (Score:1)
Re:ISP email username? (Score:2)
Ah, yes. They just introduced DSL here in Jakarta, with even more outrageous pricing. Rp 350 000 (~ 30) gets you a 384kbps downstream.. with a 500MB/mo bandwith cap! Unlimited 512kbps costs 10 times that.
Figures are with the national comms carrier's ISP, probably a bit cheaper with an outside service but not too much. Sad.
Yeah, it sucks (Score:1)
As for your username+password, uh.. I know it goes against hacker instincts to do this, but you could talk to your ISP support people. ;-)
Re:Yeah, it sucks (Score:1)
I know you can get virtual servers. It's not the same thing. If my brother now feels the need to send me
SMTP auth is quite a normal thing to ask for.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:SMTP auth is quite a normal thing to ask for.. (Score:1)
That's really what all this rant is about. I can understand them requiring SMTP AUTH for normal users, but I'm not really a "normal users" as I consider their service only as a "pipe" to the internet. I don't use anything from them except that.
Masquerading as your ISP (Score:2)
Like I said [slashdot.org], you don't want to masquerade as your ISP (although I could have been more explicit before). If you instead try masquerading as jawtheshark.com, then it should work, assuming your Unix login is the same as the user part of your email address -- if not, you need some extra trickery.
Re:Masquerading as your ISP (Score:1)
I have not implemented the changes yet, and I called the system administrators at work to indicate what they were doing and there
Grumble (Score:2)
The IP range we are in is properly marked as belonging to our provider but it doesn't seem to be flagged as being a DSL line. Also it doesn't appear that their dynamic IP range is flagged either.
Of course it doesn't hurt that we have proper matching forward and reverse records for the mail machine. I suspect that it helps that my ISP whil