Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:It's only fair use if you go to court... (Score 1) 298

This is very true. If he's willing he should file a DMCA counter notice ( go to http://www.chillingeffects.org/ for help) . The big caveat is that he needs to be ready to go to court if he does that (they may or may not want to but he has to be ready). Google is obligated by the law to put it back up unless they receive notice from the record company that they 'have ALREADY' filed suit (in which case they guys duke it out). If they don't hear back in 10 days then they have to put it back up and actually Google is pretty good at sticking to that and not pulling it down for some other reason right away. They are fully protected from being sued about it once they wait the 10 days.

Comment Re:iTunes policy won't work on the desktop (Score 1) 754

He means that given the choice, the market decided that they preferred something other than Apple more than they preferred Apple.

That logic doesn't make sense. Iphone is ONE phone compared to the enormous amount of options for android. When you combine all android phones of course you're going to quickly get more then Apple that isn't a surprise, or news, especially when Apple does not allow others to use their OS. Android's whole point is to provide options for a ton of phones. You're comparing Apples and Oranges.

Comment Use tax cont. (Score 1) 276

I was beaten to the punch on bring this up but it's important. What no one seems to remember when they talk about the "internet sales tax" is that unless the federal government decides to put their own tax on internet goods this isn't a new tax. The problem is that they don't collect the tax, you are still required to pay it when you are a state citizen using it there (or some legal ruling of the sort) generally in the form of the use tax. Some states I believe still count it as the sales tax and just say that you have to self report/pay it yourself, the end result is the same though it the same % and you are supposed to pay it regardless. The problem? No one does. The general argument from internet companies is that they shouldn't be required to shoulder the expense of collecting and paying ever state their share, this has generally been accepted as a legitimate argument in the end but always gets brought up again because the honest fact is that it IS a tax on the books that never actually gets collected (and always gets extra looks around budget time for that reason). It isn't interstate taxation and has been upheld as that multiple times. The reason is simple: It only applies to you when you bring it in and only applies once. This is why you are asked if you have paid tax to other states before. If you pay the sales tax of another state you are not supposed to have to pay the use tax for it when you bring it into your state. If your state has higher tax you are supposed to pay the difference. The problem with internet sales is that for most states you don't pay it at all. I'm not going to lie, I haven't paid use tax but the fact remains that you ARE supposed to. Some cases of it are easier for them to catch. I know many states hit you if you can't prove you paid tax on your out of state purchased automobile for example (when you register it).

Comment bigger then vista? (Score 1) 771

anyone else notice that the link saying that it takes up more resources then vista is actually a link to a blog post on how it takes up more resources then xp? Though the fact that it uses a ton of resources definitely stands. So far from playing around Chrome seems alot more streamlined then IE8, even its instancing habits seem to be a little better and you can tell what its new process means!. Microsoft has horrible habits for naming its process things that make you wonder if its a bad program or not.

Slashdot Top Deals

Marriage is the sole cause of divorce.

Working...