This really nails it. The whole point of this type of experience is to 'be there'. If you went to a live game and sat courtside the worst possible thing would be for the facility to bring over a flatscreen monitor and block your view of the game so they could shove the 'dunk cam' down your eyeballs and put up loadspeakers in your ears so you had to listen to commentary.

The hardware has so much more capabilities to offer up the views as if you were in a future stadium. A 100 foot screen behind the backboard showing the dunk that i get to see from my virtual courtside seat for instance. Not a cut scene. No talking 'in your head'

Most of the VR/AR content I've seen commits the same crime, they're desperate to highlight the hardware and system instead of getting out of the way. I would like to basically forget I'm wearing the kit. I should be a bit surprised to find out the there isn't an extra jumbotron over each basket. I should hear the announcements as I would sitting in the arena, not the comentary like I was sitting at home on my couch.

I've argued for some time that the benefit of most 4k content is HDR, not pixels. If you encode your 4k HDR down to 1080P HDR you're like 95% as good on a TV screen. On a computer monitor you see the difference a bit more but that's just not how most people consume movies and TV, or if they do it's a laptop at a further distance.

I'd love to see a 'premium' 1080p tier that is basically max bitrate before diminishing returns, highest framerates, and HDR.

The 'available' leaf is way too small. The upcoming leaf is a bit better, but $30k for a base model car is way too much especially when compared to the Versa at $17k. The value difference between these 2 cars isn't $13k.

And that equinox ev, it's basically the same size as the Trax (ie, it's not an 'equinox' with ev added). $15k gap in pricing there. The value difference between the Trax at 30mpg and the eq.EV at say 100-110 'eMPG' (I dont see it claimed in the specs) is no where near a $15k gap.

Both of these vehicles is positioned as a premium option in their vehicle class (if you include gas and ev).

These are the two cheapest (price and build) evs in the market and they are $13-15k premiums over a gas car in the same class.

They need models with half the range and $10k knocked off the price tags.

Auto makers seem to be willfully missing the point.

Only a small percent of people want a $50K+++ long range electric vehicle and automakers have been almost entirely focused on the most expensive options possible. They are catering to early adopters. This space is much better served by hybrids (or better PHEVs) and the sales numbers prove this out.

The few 100-150mile range EVs are micro-cars, unsuitable for many families.

The marketing on the PHEV has been underwhelming, but IMO the 40-60mile PHEV is likely the ideal combination for most, except that the price tag on these is as a premium car.

We've been through a few rounds of these car choices now and it very much seems like automakers don't want to offer the combinations people want because it would completely destroy their sales on the other models. Want a hybrid F150?, only the top tier model supports this. PHEV RAV4?, top tier model.

Most people have relatively short commutes and occasional longer drives. Keeping primarily in EV mode could have so many people in a 'hybrid 75MPG equivalent' every day and still 35MPG when they go on a road trip and no battery anxiety.

They were lucky enough to have the resources to 're-invent' their manufacturing proccesses.

For most, this is out of reach.

This is where I feel our government should be focusing. Not in trying to build barriers to trade to allow uncompetative US companies to survive, but to revitilize manufacturing in the US much like Sharpied did. If Sharpie can build their product in the US at a better price, it means they can export those products as well.

The company that survives through protectionism alone has no foreign markets and doesn't help us with balanced trade.

this obviously isn't the first version of Kodi, and it currently doesn't run on anything that low spec today.

no sideloading and it doesn't run android, so Kodi likely wont be installable much less functional.

there's certainly no concensus on neanderthal and sapiens being the same species, that's very fringy, unless you're stretching out 'same species' to mean anything that can interbreed and if you do that you just cut the number of species on the planet down by 90% or more.

I've read some compelling pieces that modern humans were uniquely able to invent a few things that our cousin's didn't have. maybe enough short term memory to 'imagine' a town or farm, or the ability to imagine years into the future. Our neanderthal cousins were very likely just as 'smart' as us but probably in a bit different way. I question the timelines of our advancement and seeing arcticlues like this make me more confident that the timelines are wrong. I think there's enough evidence that modern humans were into agriculture much sooner. The existence of 20,000+ year old pots suggests basic agriculture or at least placing villages near natural outcroppings of edible plants. The only real purpose for a clay pot is to store plant food. meat doesn't keep in pots and water goes stale in pots. I think it's reasonable to think that maybe we were well ahead of things until the ice age hit and then we mostly started over.

I doubt we'll ever have satisfactory answers to these questions though. time ticks. most of the evidence is fragile.

seems like a pretty clear cut case of 'will of the people' overriding government authoritarianism. I'm not arguing that there isn't good reason to ban the fireworks in an area that frequency suffers devastating fires, but this isn't exactly that. People are doing this in the city in substantial numbers, enough that the 'government' should rethink the model. California seems plagued with 'nany state' tendancies.

I just wonder how the people don't vote these people out?

I don't think that Desktop Linux is going to take over as a result of these things, but I am seeing SOME small movement for people that went looking as soon as the ads started showing up in Windows. A lot of these went to Mac, but a not-insignificant number jumped to Linux on their existing hardware. Not earth-moving numbers, but it's one step closer to a threshold where Windows loses it's 'defacto' status.

Plenty of time for Microsoft to adjust for sure, but I think the ads are enough to turn more serious buyers away or have them consider alternatives. We've already seen a ~5% of market gain for MAC and 2% for linux (which is about a 50% increase on Mac and a 100% increase on Linux) in the last 10 years. If you remove the 'value' end of the market these numbers are more substantial.

Windows is still king and will be for quite some time, but there is some threshold number where the operating system is irrelevant. When we hit that point, and some major players like Adobe make Linux a first-class target, and if game devs make Linux first-class then the dominos will fall.

I suspect the new xbox licensing model is an attempt by Microsoft to keep gaming tied to Windows.

What vmware has is a product that doesn't have any near-peers at the enterprise level. There are substantially better alternatives at the SMB level and vmware is losing them in droves.

The thing to watch is how the 'SMB' level products are working very hard to bridge the enterprise gap and become near-enough peers to vmware to get the enterprise over.

Now, there are radically different models that are peer-level with vmware, they're just so foreign a design to existing IT staff that it's a difficult migration. Openstack for instance can likely fit right into vmware but it's a wildly different toolkit.

So this is sort of a race to extract maximum profits before enterprises re-tool or another product elevates a bit.

it's interesting because I use this feature quite often. airdrop and airplay is a constant for me, and I often use continuity camera for meetings because I can convert from a desktop view to my iphone and show poeple things easier. Similarly taking notes etc I can move it to my ipad and draw on things mid-meeting in a way that is much nicer than using the mouse. imessage and facetime 'continuity' might be what keeps me on mac entirely if not for great battery on my macbook and ipads.

Now, it took a while to remember to use these things and get muscle memory for it, but now that I've done that these are indespensible tools

A clone font is not piracy, it's a clone, and it's completely legal. There is no irony here and no piracy.

You might consider how you would behave if someone criticised you. Would you let that person into your home? These are, at least on paper, private facilities.

I think this is a distraction from the real problem. These 'public' like facilities are often built, refurbished, or maintained with public funds. The moment that happens, some public access rules need to be in place. They exist on the backs of taxpayers but get to operate as if they are a private space with no compromises.

not semantics. SE was previous gen specs. 6E is modern specs but trimmed down. ie, 6E has the single 48MP camera, skipping the telephoto lens but it's the modern camera. 6E is the modern CPU, just with 1 less GPU core. The SE was 1-2 generations of CPU behind, and not just a single camera, a couple generations out of date camera. SE was like taking a 1-2 generation out of date phone and throwing it in a blastic box and calling it new. The 6E is a current gen phone and features with no frills.

I never considered an SE for my family because it was so cut-rate across the board. The 6E is probably going to be the next upgrade for the parents and the kids. I'm pretty excited for it because despite the price tag, it's a good value in the facetime+icloud ecosystem.

No apple fanboi'ing here, but Apple's got a good lockin with facetime and simple sharing for non-technical people and that wins the war for the 'family' even if i lose out on android tricks.