Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:It's hard to draw an audience for laptop conten (Score 1) 29

That's a reasonable point. I failed to mention that along with the mainstreaming/commodification of laptops and the resulting consumerist orientation, technically oriented reviews have essentially evaporated and so the quality of current laptop journalism is generally abysmal. That kind of deep technical info is exactly what I would try and enumerate on the sites that I ran myself, but compiling that info is tedious and while it leads to high quality content, the page goes stale in a year or two after the next refresh cycle and it stops generating revenue. It's a tough business model to float these days. If I'm trying to find things like that now, I first look at notebookcheck which has a pretty decent database, then I'll look at specsheet PDFs, and finally I'll look at somewhere like provantage or insight that tend to have more detailed specifications on a lot of the models that they sell. There is a site called productindetail that aggregates a lot of this and is worth bookmarking. Still, real world battery life and speaker output are going to be hard to find without a real user review. That's where forums came in, but even that got eaten alive by reddit.

Comment It's hard to draw an audience for laptop content (Score 3, Insightful) 29

Back in the 90s and early 2000s especially with the advent of gaming laptops, there were plenty of opportunities. Post-covid, where laptops became ubiquitous tools, the enthusiasm for and novelty of laptop journalism content just isn't there anymore. With the lack of transparency around throttling and wattage on any given model and the days of custom BIOS mods and GPU ROMs being pretty much over, technically elite hardcore enthusiasts are few and far between. Without a sizeable community to tweak and push the boundaries of the hardware, consumerism and commoditization is all that's left. I've contributed to and run multiple laptop-oriented websites/forums and the pointy-haired corporate owned ones sank years ago due to rapid declines in traffic and advertising revenue. There's probably a bit of generative AI-caused deth knell in here too for laptopmag, as getting paid for web content just doesn't seem to be all that viable unless you have a rabid subscriber base.

Comment Re:is waterboarding next to get the info? (Score 2, Informative) 486

No, they just need to send it to Wikileaks and tell them it's a video of waterboarding.

In all fairness I don't think parent is a troll, I think it's a weak attempt at a joke about wikileaks breaking encryption:

Somehow -- it will not say how -- WikiLeaks found the necessary computer time to decrypt a graphic video, released Monday, of a United States Army assault in Baghdad in 2007 that left 12 people dead, including two employees of the news agency Reuters.

Comment Re:Clones? (Score 1) 584

Wow. The iPad was revealed only after other tablets in the category had been revealed, such as the HP Slate and the Joojoo, yet they are the clones. Nothing seems to be able to escape the distortion field -- not even a Linux enthusiast.

Thank you. I was just about to post about how silly this is. It shows how powerful the Apple marketing machine is. They're apparently a trendsetter, even though we've seen similar (real and concept) devices in the past. Everything that comes after the iPad is doomed to be a 'clone'. *sigh*

Comment Re:Is it time to look yet? (Score 1) 368

It wasn't literal hours of just configuration. It was hours of reading docs and trying to figure out how to tweak things without losing functionality and minimizing clutter. Some of that was just learning a new environment. It wasn't terribly hard but it was not intuitive. Like getting rid of sounds for instance. Anyways you post is pretty condescending. I am just posting an opinion, it's not a manifesto and it doesn't need to concern you too much.

Comment Re:Is it time to look yet? (Score 1) 368

Yeh it is PEBKAC for the entire reason that I tried KDE 4.3. The rest is my opinion, and it took me hours to get it configured, so that gave me a headache. Granted I am used to Gnome, but I've tried KDE 4 before. I am going to give 4.4 a shot, I don't want it to be Gnome, I just want it to not make me want to bash my head against the wall. I'm not trying to put KDE down; otherwise I would post flamebait as AC to be modded down. Oh, here come the mods now... *ducks*

Comment Re:Is it time to look yet? (Score 2, Interesting) 368

I know it's ironic complaining as a Gnome user about configuration, but that's why I am going to try 4.4. The default KDE configuration to me is riddled with excess and it feels like it's trying to show off instead of let me work. The complaint was not that I broke my dependencies; the entire reason for me trying KDE 4.3 was _because_ I broke my Gnome dependencies and fscked things up from a fault of my own.

Comment Re:Is it time to look yet? (Score 0) 368

I tried 4.3 a week or so ago when I accidentally broke my Debian Sid system's Gnome dependencies while they weren't in the repo. Man, it was a *headache* to use for about a week. I will give 4.4 a shot, mostly since I can't believe how terrible my experience was and I'd like to see some progress. The raw amount of configuration I had to do to get it to STFU and do my bidding was obnoxious. It's like they hide basic configuration options on purpose. Granted, it looks GREAT and has some nice features like rolling over folders to navigate, etc. I'm not too sure the flashy interface is too functional. But maybe I'm too Gnome-hardened at this point for it to be an easy conversion.

Slashdot Top Deals

"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight

Working...