Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment don't hide under the bed (Score 1) 1015

If aliens exist and have the ability to travel a hundred light years to get to us (and to have found us no less) -- and they would probably have been around for a million more years than we, as our technological era is rather new -- then if their intention were bad, we'd have 0.00% chance of a) knowing they were coming, b) evading them, or c) defeating them. So there's no point in raising fear about something we can't even avoid. I know his moral is that we shouldn't be seeking them out or doing things that might draw attention to us, but I think that threat is rather minor.

The kind of fear of aliens he's proffering is a mere extension of our fear of our own mutual aggression because of our being primitive enough to have such a concept called "war," and the fact that we're not even smart enough to live in harmony with and hence sustainably in our own environment, and we didn't need to hear it from Stephen Hawking for those particular two synapses to fire. His ideas aren't new or fresh; we just have a tendency of treating them as something profound because they happen to come from Stephen Hawking. Think Independency Day, War of the Worlds, Aliens, Predator, Earth: Final Conflict, Stargate SG-1, etc. etc. going back decades. Just because he's good at math and cosmological speculation (*speculation*, no less -- he's not an oracle) doesn't mean that he has any special insight on this topic. He's just having fun with his authoritative status..

If they have bad intentions we won't be able to stop them. If they have good intentions and let us know it and we don't believe them, running away won't be an option (unless they leave voluntarily just because of the distrustful atmosphere). In fact if they have good intentions and they're smart (which they would be), such a fear of them would probably delay any ambition of theirs to publicly contact us. The ideas he's spreading are merely the planetary-level analogue to xenophobia or agoraphobia, or as the OP said, "hiding under our collective bed" with respect to the greater universe -- as if we're not a worried and anxious enough species already.

On the topic of the aliens themselves, though.. considering how new our technological development is, and how long species tend to last, and the mere hypothetical fact of their being able to reach vast distances to get to us, we're perfectly willing to admit that they may be millions of years "older" than we, technologically speaking. But we don't seem to fathom that being around for millions of years would likely mean growing in all imaginable dimensions, not just technological -- spiritual, emotional, psychological, cultural, universal understanding/awareness, etc. Even here on Earth some humans are vastly more advanced than others (think Gandhi, Sai Baba, the Dalai Lama, and so on), and they don't even have the advantage of a sane culture or a million years of cultural evolution. Just imagine how graceful the aliens must be -- in fact that's probably the *only* reason they haven't made a public announcement of their presence: they're probably well aware of us and smart enough to either a) follow something loosely like the "Prime Directive" (I say "loosely" because they wouldn't be dense enough to treat it as an absolute even at the expense of common sense or compassion), and/or b) they don't want to cause the mass panic or even just general anxiety that would result from such an exposure, or if nothing else to impose themselves where they might not feel particularly invited by the collective mentality. My belief is that, though there are always exceptions, in general the other species in the universe are at best like "big brothers" (not Orwellian), and at worse something like an average neighbor -- not particularly malicious, and likely willing to lend a helping hand if they happen to come across such a necessity.

Comment article is misleading (Score 1) 125

going by that article you'd think their method is something a simple as re.replace("\b(LOL)\b", "laughing out loud",text), but if you actually read the patent, the illustrations alone take up 12 pages. they use methods to determine meaning of the acronym based on context.

patents are too hard for me to read so i don't really know how abusive this is, but the important thing is we won't be paying royalties any time soon for LOLing.

the article is worded to push your buttons.

Comment Re:Yeah, and? (Score 2, Interesting) 109

Collecting information about people's habits without their knowledge or explicit consent for the purpose of making money is reptilian. I say reptilian because I'm not sure that I can say it's unethical, because I don't believe that taking pictures of people in public is unethical. But then, what they do is more akin to paying someone you're likely to speak to to secretly record your conversation for them.

If we all believed that companies just wanted to serve our best interests, then there would be no backlash against this kind of profiling. But since we know on a deep level that corporations are fundamentally cold, evil and without conscience, it bothers us. You could say that by the devil's grace it just happens to work out so that serving their best interests serves ours, but that does not make it not reptilian.

And saying that, basically, if you don't want companies to profile you then surf anonymously is dangerously close to saying that if you don't want to be shot (and injured) by a criminal then wear a bullet-proof vest. Or if you don't want someone creating a voodoo doll in your likeness and dipping you in vaults of various acids in effigy, or perhaps collecting a DNA swipe off of a counter you touched to analyze it on their computer and determine the best pick-up line to give you the next day, then wear a hair net, a veil, gloves, a long-sleeved shirt and pants whenever you go out. Or maybe just a burqa to make it easier. We shouldn't _have_ to hide.. Oh, yeah, and the DNA analyst at his computer is just trying to figure out how to best serve you, right?

TBH though, there is no law against making a voodoo doll of someone and burning it (and I don't want the Inquisition all over again), so it's iffy whether companies should legally be allowed to do that. But I'm certainly not going to be apologetic for them..

Slashdot Top Deals

A LISP programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing. -- Alan Perlis

Working...