Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Fuel efficiency is the wrong metric (Score 1) 1114

Most of the hypermiling I've read about is about increasing mileage, not about using less fuel. Some of the techniques involve driving out of your way if you know you can get above average mileage for doing so. To me, this is silly.

If you want to save money on fuel, use less fuel.

For example, because a warm engine is way more efficient than a cold engine, trip combining can be a big fuel saver. Similarly, with only a little planning, preparing dinner at home saves fuel.

Perhaps we should call this Agile Driving? ... eXtreme Driving? ...Lean Driving?

Feed Science Daily: Switchgrass: Bridging Bioenergy And Conservation (sciencedaily.com)

An important part of the answer to the country's energy woes could be blowing in the prairie wind, according to a plant geneticist. He has spent the past 10 years breeding switchgrass, an eight-foot-plus native plant that was an integral part of the tall grass prairies that once dominated America's Midwest. As a breeder, he is mostly concerned with the plant's bioenergy-friendly attributes, including its ability to accumulate large amounts of biomass and tolerate environmental stress.

Feed Techdirt: Vonage Loses Yet Another Patent Case (techdirt.com)

Vonage has already had enough trouble actually making their business profitable without having to worry about a barrage of patent lawsuits over highly questionable patents. But thanks to a patent system that approves a tremendous number of overly broad patents on obvious ideas, that's what you get. Already appealing a similar case from Verizon, a jury has found Vonage guilty of violating a bunch of Sprint patents. Juries will often find in favor of the patent holder, so this isn't much of a surprise. Vonage will most certainly appeal and the case is far from over. However, given how much effort the company needs to put into fighting these patents, the company may not be able to survive. The really sad thing is that the technology behind VoIP has almost nothing to do with Vonage's success. There were a ton of companies that had tried and failed to make popular VoIP plays before (and after) Vonage. What Vonage did was actually innovate: taking the basic idea that everyone knew about, and turning it into an offering that people wanted to buy. That's where Verizon, Sprint and other incumbents failed. For them to come back afterwards, and claim patent infringement is simply sour grapes. They were unable (and unwilling) to create the services that people wanted -- and now they want to shut down the company that actually did innovate -- and they're likely to succeed. That's not how the patent system is supposed to work.

Slashdot Top Deals

The decision doesn't have to be logical; it was unanimous.

Working...