I've noticed the guys working for me just can't grasp the concept of this: systemctl start email@example.com
That is an example of instantiated services which are a pretty handy feature.systemd.unit(5) documents this feature. If your 'guys' aren't into reading manuals for the tools they use, it's not that hard to figure out what's going on just reading the openvpn@.service file.
We use four different Linux distributions and six other UNIXes, so that small inconsistency turns into a big thing.
systemd is becoming standard, so there will be *fewer* inconsistencies between distros. One of the biggest drivers behind all the systemd hate seems to be resistance to learning new things, which is a shame because systemd is actually pretty cool.
How is it that nobody has brought up that Debian still has sysvinit available, including for the upcoming Debian 9 "stretch".The release notes for Debian 8 "Jessie" included instructions for how to stick with sysvinit if you didn't want systemd. That was two years ago, and sysvinit is still an option in Debian today.
Do "init freedom lovers" include people that like systemd? It seems to me that Debian gives you that freedom, and Devuan takes it away so that you cannot choose systemd.
There are valid criticisms of systemd. I understand that some people who have tried it don't like it. That's fine, people can and should use what they want. However I often doubt that systemd haters have really given it a chance, bothered to learn the new technology at all, or explored the new things that are possible and easy with systemd.
Personally I think systemd is the best thing on GNU/Linux since package managers with dependency resolution.
I agree and strongly prefer using systemd unit files to init scripts. Also the place to put your local unit files is
I would mod you up for this but I don't get points anymore.
Thank you for calling the telcos robber barons, that is exactly what they are. Net neutrality isn't about government regulation, it's about not ceding power to regulate the internet to corporations.
If the government cannot be trusted to regulate the internet, how can we possibly trust a handful of corporate giants? It's ridiculous to argue that the interests of the telcos are in line with the interests of everybody else.
A free internet is just as important as a free market. Without net neutrality, innovation on the internet will be crippled once only the incumbent giants can afford to pay premium for the fast lane.
I'm no fan of big government, but I cannot understand why so many advocates of small government are not also afraid of the big business trampling all over their rights and freedoms. The reality is that the Fortune 500 are integral part of how the world is "governed", whether they fall under the category of government or not. Where is the Tea Bagger uprising against the corporate establishment?
It's worth nothing that you cannot run arbitrary code on a Tivo because they use DRM to prevent unsigned kernels from being loaded. "Tivo-ization" was a primary motivation for the FSF to write the GPL3.
Myself, I don't understand why some people draw the line for software freedom at embedded systems. I can understand it if most people would want to use the ROM that came with their phone/media player/ebook reader/DVR unaltered. But we should have the right to do whatever we want with our devices.
The Openmoko community is a breeding ground for mobile Linux distros and and the FSO middleware. FSO and these distros, like SHR, Hackable:1, QtMoko will eventually be ported to other devices. That's one reason why Openmoko is still relevant. The work being done on Freerunners now will eventually result in being able to replace the proprietary parts of the Pre or the n900 with all Free software, or potentially replace the OS on an Android phone with a Linux distro that runs a X.org server.
The people using and developing for the Openmoko phones are very familiar with its faults. They use the phone and develop for it because the Freerunner is the most open handset available. It's a labour of love, and there are a lot of folks in the community that are very committed to Free Software.
If nothing else, Openmoko gave a bunch of nerds a crack at creating their own mobile operating system. It had the potential (and maybe still does through FSO and SHR) to enable the kind of built in the garage innovation that brought about companies like HP and Apple. That's a bit of a long shot, but a lot of great work has come out of the Openmoko community and things are still moving along.
Are you sure about that? From the quick facts side-bar on the CPIC overview page:
The Automated Canada United States Police Information Exchange System (ACUPIES) provides CPIC users a link to the U.S. National Crime Information Centre data banks, and all U.S. users access to the CPIC files. Currently, this link is processing over 12 million transactions per year.
Wikipedia links to a reference that claims that the "wandering persons" database (for tracking alzheimers patients) is not shared with the US. So they don't get complete access, but they can access CPIC.
The decision doesn't have to be logical; it was unanimous.