Putting it simply for your brain damaged self. (Score -1)

An intelligent person would glean the truth from what I said, but I'll elaborate a little more. I realize that pretty much everyone here is retarded. Also, I refer below to all objects of rights violations as victims, even if they're not victims in the moral sense of involving causation.

We're given a situation in which some tyrant is violating people's rights. The tyrant might be a rebel or it might be an invader. That people's rights are going to be violated is necessitated by the tyrant.

Either the tyrant will choose the victims to further whatever his goals are, or the government will choose the victims to thwart the tyrant and end victimization. The only reason rights are being violated in the first place is that the tyrant prefers it.

Now, the tyrant retains all his rights, as everyone always does. Rights, by definition (secular or religious), are inalienable. Preferably, the government will violate the tyrant's right to life and thereby end his threat to others' rights. That people's rights will be violated is already given because of the tyrant; the government chooses the tyrant himself as the preferred victim of the rights violations necessitated by the tyrant; and hopefully, the rights violations will end once the tyrant has been denied his rights. Of course, the tyrant prefers that the results of his initiation of rights violations will not include his own rights ever being violated, so the government might have to choose victims other than the tyrant as intermediate victims enabling the government to violate the tyrant's rights.

Sometimes for the government to choose innocents as victims facilitates accessing the tyrant to violate the tyrant's rights. Either the government chooses innocents as victims in those cases, or the tyrant will choose other innocents as victims. Regardless, innocents will be victimized. If the government chooses the innocents, it chooses them because choosing them minimizes rights violations long-term. When the tyrant chooses them, it maximizes rights violations long-term. Again, innocents will be victimized. Either the tyrant will victimize many for evil, or the government will victimize few for good. Regardless, someone is choosing victims, so whining about whether or not one likes it that some people are choosing victims or whining about the standard one applies in choosing those victims is IRRELEVANT, so shut up, fag.

I hope I made this simple enough for you to understand some of the reasons why the Constitution grants Congress absolute power to defend the United States and why all governments everywhere have that absolute authority by the nature of government. The Constitution explicitly states it, but the Founders didn't have to state it. The nature of all governments is such that they have absolute authority to defend citizens from rebels and invaders.