Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Botnet

Submission + - A First Person Account of DNSChanger Takedown Operation and Clean-Up Task (circleid.com)

penciling_in writes: Paul Vixie shares his personal account of the DNSChanger takedown operation working with FBI and a worldwide team. He also explains the delay issues in identifying and notifying victims which resulted in FBI asking the judge for an extension and were given four more months. 'On July 9 2012 the replacement DNS servers operated by ISC will be shut down and any victims who still depend on these servers will face new risks,' he warns. A half dozen national Internet security teams around the world have created special web sites that will display a warning message to potential victims of the DNS Changer infection. The full list of these "DNS Checking" web sites is published on the DCWG's web site.

Comment big banks and megacorps (Score 1) 463

Have you ever heard about "big banks and megacorps lobbying for centralized, electronic, traceable currency"?

There are effectively as many (or more - depending on your world view) "big banks and megacorps" who would prefer anonymous, untracable cash, believe me.

Keep to the point. And the point might just not be "big banks and megacorps".

Comment Re:No. (Score 1) 502

So if you had enough of these, you could air condition your house with them?
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

In theory.
--
I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....

Are you out of your mind?

Comment Re:Check Estonia (Score 1) 405

Yes, but how does this connect to online voting? With population size I may almost understand (probability of malicious people present growing, then again also the talent pool to choose from for designing the system) but with density... Would you consider online banking somewhat connected with population density?

Comment Re:Check Estonia (Score 1) 405

Estonian system does not have electronic receipt. But it seems to be a good idea to adopt - something signed by government secret key would eliminate a number of attack vectors and make indeed possible pulling them together at some point. The obvious problem of potential vote-buying is eased by allowing everyone to vote as many times as they want (there was a 58-year old woman voting 553 times last time, when she was called by election authority to check if anything is wrong and to inform her that only the last vote counts she said she knows, but she just likes the procedure) and if you vote on paper then this will be considered to be the final vote.

But as said in other comments we do have national id-card with crypto chip (with which I can also give digital signatures legally equivalent to physical ones, access my bank account etc) which makes it all easier to implement.

Comment Re:Check Estonia (Score 1) 405

I have voted online for three times now in Estonia (well, once from abroad). By the last elections most of my friends as well as family did. Convenient as hell.

It is always a good idea to discuss even the theoretical attack vectors but for me (considering myself somewhat tech-savvy, lacking tinfoil hat though - I even have a google account) it is secure enough - indeed, I would welcome the same scrutiny on paper-based voting. The fact that there are ways to hack into a bank account will not make me abandon my online bank credentials.

25% of the votes were cast online during last parliamentary elections couple of months ago - it is really not the electronic voting by itself one should concentrate their thoughts on but the design of the system. Estonian one is worth studying.

Slashdot Top Deals

The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.

Working...