increm - Slashdot User

Comment Re:The Copyright Office says "who cares." (Score 1) 139

by increm on Thursday January 21, 2016 @06:52PM (#51347133) Attached to: Game Historian: Gygax Swiped Fantasy Rules From a Forgotten 1970 Wargame

Where do you see any mention of copyright or intellectual property in the linked article or the post? You're arguing against a claim nobody is making.

Comment Re:and? (Score 1) 139

by increm on Thursday January 21, 2016 @05:03PM (#51346413) Attached to: Game Historian: Gygax Swiped Fantasy Rules From a Forgotten 1970 Wargame

The significance is that some guy name Leonard Patt that no one has ever heard of before deserves some credit he never got. That's it.

Comment Re:But the REAL question on all our minds is... (Score 1) 139

by increm on Thursday January 21, 2016 @04:58PM (#51346385) Attached to: Game Historian: Gygax Swiped Fantasy Rules From a Forgotten 1970 Wargame

You don't get paid for it.

Submission + - Celebrating Dungeons & Dragons' 40th Anniversary

Submitted by disconj on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @05:54PM

disconj writes: With the 40th anniversary of the release of Dungeons & Dragons coming up this weekend, the Internet is ablaze with reflections on its legacy. Dave Ewalt gives an intro for the uninitiated. Ethan Gilsdorf explains how "all I need to know about life I learned from 'Dungeons & Dragons.'" Jon Peterson presents a video show-and-tell of rare artifacts from D&D's development. How did D&D change your life, and what will you be doing to celebrate this Sunday?

Submission + - Security vendors self-censor Target breach details (computerworld.com.au)

Submitted by angry tapir on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @05:43PM

angry tapir writes: At least three security companies have scrubbed information related to Target from the Web, highlighting the ongoing sensitivity around one of the largest-ever data breaches. How hackers broke into Target and installed malware on point-of-sale terminals that harvested up to 40 million payment card details is extremely sensitive. Now, details that give insight into the attack are being hastily removed or redacted by security companies.

Submission + - Chrome Bugs Lets Sites Listen to Your Private Conversations (talater.com)

Submitted by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @05:43PM

An anonymous reader writes: Last year Google rolled out a new feature for the desktop version of Chrome that enabled support for voice recognition directly into the browser. In September, a developer named Tal Ater found a bug that would allow a malicious site to record through your microphone even after you'd told it to stop. Quoting: 'When you grant an HTTPS site permission to use your mic, Chrome will remember your choice, and allow the site to start listening in the future, without asking for permission again. This is perfectly fine, as long as Chrome gives you clear indication that you are being listened to, and that the site can’t start listening to you in background windows that are hidden to you. When you click the button to start or stop the speech recognition on the site, what you won’t notice is that the site may have also opened another hidden popunder window. This window can wait until the main site is closed, and then start listening in without asking for permission. This can be done in a window that you never saw, never interacted with, and probably didn’t even know was there.' Ater reported this to Google in September, and they had a fix ready a few days later. But they haven't rolled it out yet — they can't decide whether or not it's the proper way to block this behavior. Thus: the exploit remains. Ater has published the source code for the exploit to encourage Google to fix it.

Slashdot Top Deals