Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: "Harmful" response? (Score 1) 58

Naw, we were frustrated with D&D's lack of direction on many issues--especially experience points. AD&D was a godsend in many ways and held far more interest for everyone I knew.

I still have my circa 1977 D&D boxed set (minus the box) and my copy of Chainmail. They are in great condition because they didn't get used much. My AD&D books, on the other hand, are absolutely beat to hell.

Comment Re:"Harmful" response? (Score 1) 58

What kind of dumbass would trust this technology to act for them?

I'll book my own damn plane tickets--and it says something about the fatuous privileged clowns behind some of these features that this is something (along with making restaurant reservations) people really need.

The words coming from the LLM aren't the problem, the idiot who naively executes them (and thereby assumes responsibility for the results) is the real problem. We had a lot of this kind of thing in the early days of the Internet, it's not a new issue at all.

Comment Re:"Harmful" response? (Score 2) 58

Words are actions. That's why for most crimes, the abetment of the crime is a judicable offense.

I don't know which banana republic you live in, but here in the USA the Department of Justice has this to say:

2474. Elements Of Aiding And Abetting

The elements necessary to convict under aiding and abetting theory are

1. That the accused had specific intent to facilitate the commission of a crime by another;
2. That the accused had the requisite intent of the underlying substantive offense;
3. That the accused assisted or participated in the commission of the underlying substantive offense; and
4. That someone committed the underlying offense.

Source

A reasonable understanding of the subject would give you to understand the main thrust is about knowledge of the illegality of the actions committed and the intent. Mens rea is central here, and words are just a possible manifestation of same.

Comment Re:LLMs need a "last step before output" filter (Score 1) 58

You seem to not be aware of the comical effects of such attempts.

But gtfo with your nannybot just on general principles. If you want a browser plugin to shield you from such things, I'm cool with that. But I am an adult and words emitted by a computer pose no risk to me (assuming they can't self-execute as code).

Comment Re:"Harmful" response? (Score 1) 58

Now imagine an evil co-worker ...

Sounds like classic PEBKAC to me.

You know, we have people doing stupid hateful shit to each other all the time because of what they read in some "holy" book. Do we blame the book? Some stupid people do, yes, but the responsibility properly belongs to the person doing stupid hateful shit.

History has taught us that suppression of ideas is both bad and fruitless, but now it seems we have two generations that grew up in the wake of 9/11 that are completely on board with censorship because of Karl Popper memes or other dumbass reasons.

Comment Re:"Harmful" response? (Score 2) 58

Me:

The idea that words generated by a computer program can cause "harm" is a hallmark of the decay of Western culture.

You:

Are you claiming that words cannot cause harm or only that words cannot cause harm when they are generated by a computer?

Wow, man, it's a mystery! I don't know, and it doesn't matter. How do you feel about it? That's the important thing, not what a person actually says.

Slashdot Top Deals

Time is an illusion perpetrated by the manufacturers of space.

Working...