Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Stay on the road (Score 1) 535

I would never expect a self driving car to swerve to avoid contact. Computer vision is still very dumb, and it could see a sheet as a wall and decide to swerve into the crowd behind the sheet thinking it was causing less harm. Plus the false positive causing random swerving around the road when a cloud goes over the road. Plus it's likely to cause a bigger accident when it hits the gravel edge and flips the car. If anything get longer range sensors and preempt the conditions ahead and adjust the speed accordingly. This still isn't ideal as it'll mean the driverless cars randomly slow down for no apparent reason.

Comment All new features from the previous version??? (Score 1) 109

I was just forced to reinstall windows after the last update bricked the PC. Apparently my "Administrator" decided that I can't update settings on my PC, and that I must have a password to open my computer. It now gives me the kind option of paying to switch to Enterprise to use the functionality that's been standard.

Comment Facebook doorbell (Score 1) 84

What I'm waiting for is the facebook security camera/doorbell. They've got facial data for most people on facebook, and have demographic info. Whenever a "friend" rocks up to the front door, it can send alert. Your local delivery people can have the door automatically unlock to put the package inside. When the derelicts rock up, automatically call the cops. Jehovah witness, send out the alarm to stay away from the front door and windows.

Comment cost and durability (Score 1) 330

The main issue is that any watch over $200 is expected to last 10-20+ years. A smart watch is designed to last 1-2 years. I bought a nice citizen watch 10 years ago, and it still works and expect it to last another 10-20 years. If I go for a smart watch of the same price, its expected to be tossed after 2-3 years.

Comment Re:I would (Score 1) 747

I wasn't aware of the double deposits. I just noticed that my account was in debit for the day since I had paid a couple larger bills the day before.
Still that kind of thing should never happen since a bank should always keep things in balance at a database level (to prevent software on top doing this exact thing). To have money suddenly appear or go poof, means that there is very poorly designed code or someone intentionally put it in there.
Look at the possible implications for this if it were intentional. the second debits could have gone into someones account with them taking off with the money. Or they could have deposited a lot of money in the days before then withdrawn them before anyone noticed. In either case if it were pulled off the bank could be in deep problems.

I know this case isn't what the main story is talking about. but it is possible to get into very deep trouble if something is added without permission first. I think for a Easter Egg to be added to some software it should be approved first.

Comment Re:I would (Score 5, Interesting) 747

Thats kinda scary really if it got through an inspection process.
Just think it could be a bit of JavaScript sending bank and user details to someone. I would think that banks would be pretty strict on the code being written since their customers rely on it.
Especially when things like a major bank like Commonwealth Bank of Australia takes out a withdrawal twice, and keep the second withdrawal themselves. http://www.news.com.au/story/0,,24703544-2,00.html

Slashdot Top Deals

Contemptuous lights flashed flashed across the computer's console. -- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Working...