Comment Re:About The Best Thing The Fed And States Could D (Score 1) 155
"
Holy God, the voice of reason in this sea of nimwits. Yeah, this would seem to be the better approach, claiming MS has a monopoly when they demonstrably and provably don't and then letting the ensuing pointless consent decree carry on for years was stupid. A better approach is to look at the real problem, if there is one, and move government spending to counter that problem.
In this case, a single massively dominant OS is actually good in most ways, but possibly not in terms of the longevity and compatibility of government documents.
"
Yeah, whatever "nitwit" aka former MS employee. A review of your posts confirms this.
In any case, it was proven that MS violated the Sherman Act and had a monopoly, and this was upheld by the Court of Appeals. And no, a "single" OS isn't a good thing, STANDARDS are a good thing. MS hates standards they can't EE/E though.
You're idiotic rant that it was "demonstrably" false is just more shilling.
Holy God, the voice of reason in this sea of nimwits. Yeah, this would seem to be the better approach, claiming MS has a monopoly when they demonstrably and provably don't and then letting the ensuing pointless consent decree carry on for years was stupid. A better approach is to look at the real problem, if there is one, and move government spending to counter that problem.
In this case, a single massively dominant OS is actually good in most ways, but possibly not in terms of the longevity and compatibility of government documents.
"
Yeah, whatever "nitwit" aka former MS employee. A review of your posts confirms this.
In any case, it was proven that MS violated the Sherman Act and had a monopoly, and this was upheld by the Court of Appeals. And no, a "single" OS isn't a good thing, STANDARDS are a good thing. MS hates standards they can't EE/E though.
You're idiotic rant that it was "demonstrably" false is just more shilling.
