I'm certain the advertisers are uber excited about this feature. But I bet they're the only ones.

Just make up you're damned mind already and stick with one thing!

Seriously. My all-remote company has historically used Hangouts for meetings but they keep moving everything around. We can't constantly be taking time to keep up with it, we have actual work to do over here. Google keeps proving itself undependable, and that's a great way to lose at B2B.

I will continue to call it Zuckerbucks.

That guy was Carlos Matos. And he claims to have been scammed too.

To be fair, Substack built a whole business model off newsletters. I even subscribe to a few local journalism ones.

I look at social media way more than I should, but I honestly had never heard of Ozy, much less consumed their content, until last week's news. Had anyone else? My guess is no. Shouldn't be surprising such high numbers were completely faked.

Talk about a blast from the past!

Slashback was a thing waaaay back when where they posted a number of followups to previous stories. Example

There was an article in the local media last summer about this kind of thing.

3ETKbeiz4cg1bzCe8zVfUCuT3n5penA22S

...but where this should really shine is in airplanes! Part of what's preventing electric jumbojets is how much heavier per unit energy batteries are than gasoline, and how batteries don't just burn away as they get used. This new cell sounds like a game-changer!

Aaaaand here it is.

Allegedly created Kronos. I'd like to see the actual indictment, so hopefully that will be up soon. http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/0...

I think I know what you're getting at. Consider this:

• - There are 10 votes. 4 for party A, 3 for party B, and 3 for null. That means neither A nor B get a majority. In many cases this would trigger a runoff.
• - The three in the previous case who voted null just stay home. 4 for party A and 3 for party B means ~57% for A, who then gets a majority.

You could imagine more values which would represent "other", "invalid choice", "explicitly undecided", etc.

To be fair, not pushing a button on that part of the machine isn't strictly equivalent to an explicit "none of the above" (more equivalent to just staying home). Perhaps leaving it blank whether you go to the polls or not ought to count as a choice - it might get some politicians to stop using low turnout as a campaign strategy.

I've never seen a ballot require fields, so yes, every election I vote in functionally has a None of the Above option. I even take that option every time someone's running unopposed.