Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment I feel sorry for this guy (Score 1) 561

He followed the advice in my country the UK (6 people at most to meet at any one time) and had bad luck. Unfortunately, there seems to be a lot of Covid shaming when actually, the blame should be laid at the feet of our governments who have simply failed to get the pandemic under control.

Now in the UK, we are starting to impose lockdown measures again, because of government has a track and trace failure caused by excel (seriously, they used Excel to export and collate data to feed into our track and trace system, and didn't notice it had run out of rows for about a week) In that week they totally lost control of the virus, my city went from 200 infections per 100k to 700 per hundred k.

It's government that had screwed up, not the people.

Comment Re: why not the UK? (Score 1) 526

Brit here,I think we are missing cases, several government ministers now have it.

It started in Parliament with Nadine Dorris a junior health minister! I am beginning to think we are the new Iran and have a major, major problem.

No-one knows how Doris got it. In my view, there must be a large spread somewhere in the UK. We also exported it to Portugal in the form of 3 returning Portuguese tourists, that suggests to me, a big spread in London rather than her constituency. Which given the population density and the tube would be unsurprising.

The Government of course have done sweet fuck all up to now. Boris may now be infected (possibly the Queen too as he meets her regularly) so watch them now start to do something after it's far, far too late.

I would strongly suggest Trump imposes the same flight ban on us.

Comment Re: And they demand vacation time... (Score 5, Informative) 283

As a Brit, I think that is insane, I have 5.6 weeks of legally mandated paid leave per year, that is the minimum they are allowed to get away with. My old job gave me 32 days per year, Americans are all bonkers for putting up with the way companies treat you.

Comment Re: What a coincidence (Score 1) 594

I actually think that changing every 2 years is fairly optimal, let's be realistic here, the only way your getting a pay raise these days is change jobs (or not had an above Retail price index pay raise ever), so if you want your salary to go up you have to move jobs. You don't want to change too often because employers think you are flighty and won't stick around long, so 2 to 3 years before you move on and up seems about right.

Comment Re: What a coincidence (Score 1) 594

I'm a Brit so not quite so up to speed with the US labour market but surely as in the UK those cheaper areas are cheap because there is no work there.

My (northern) hometown has cheap house prices, but there are few jobs as such my potential earnings are much lower here than in London and the South East of England. For what my 2 bed flat (in a not very nice area) cost me in London I could get 3 bedroom house with a nice garden in a good bit of town up here, but my career opportunities would be severely limited.

Surely it's worse in the US with a much greater geographical spread, telling someone to save up to buy a house in Detroit is probably not very helpful if they are software developer or engineer and need to be where the work is?

Comment Re: Europe is the one that should be scared. (Score 1) 667

As a very pro European Brit, I'm afraid I have to agree with you. UKIP released a poster of a long line of refugees heading for Germany, it was widely decried as echoing fascism even by other leave organisations. Honestly I think it had enough of an effect to swing the vote.

See http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36570759

Slashdot Top Deals

Air is water with holes in it.

Working...