> but considering I've never heard of you,
that's called an ad homimem attack.
just because you've never hear of him doesn't mean anything.
> If you aren't willing to go the extra mile,
> especially in this job market, there is a line
> of 10 guys behind you who are
and that's called "the race to the bottom":
workers competing with each other to see who can be exploited the most. oh, he'll work weekends? I'll top that, I'll never turn my phone off, I'll sleep on the premises. f**k me harder.
you're welcome to be a sucker.
our parents and grandparents fought for the right to leisure and decent working conditions and dorks like you will give up the whole lot in 5 minutes to out-macho some poster on slashdot.
it's simple: employers have a tendency to exploit. given free reign, they'll do so to quite disturbing extremes.
workers should resist exploitation but some workers (like yourself) are either too dumb, too blind or too pathetically eager to impress to look after their own interests.
employers must be laughing their asses off when people like you bat for their team - even if you are just swinging your dick, trying to look like the big man.
talk about turkeys voting for christmas...
> please drop this pretense that you are
> entitled to be
yeah, that's right.
he's not entitled to anything.
f**k him, he's expendable.
if it kills him, there's plenty more where he came from.
f**k human decency,
f**k leisure,
f**k family,
f**k culture,
f**k self-improvement,
f**k civilisation.
from the article:
"Saying that you wouldn't hire somebody for a programming job because they don't program in their spare time is blissfully naive."
you qualify.
