Comment Re:FDA wants cellphone risks re-examined (Score 1) 360
I've relatives who live in Sebastopol. They are in absolutely no danger of being exposed to "excessive RF exposure."
This "excessive RF exposure" is defined by existing guidelines based on stoneage science. The thermal-only paradigm of RF health effects is over, dead, finito. If your relatives, or you, have a cordless DECT phone, a wi-fi router or live within the beam of greatest intensity of a cellphone tower - then you are subject to "excessive RF exposure" 24/7. Question is, how long will your body cope with the stress. My advice: offset the long-term damage by replenishing your bodies calium and anti-oxidants if you are exposed to non-stop RF exposure - especially pulsed RF.
This "excessive RF exposure" is defined by existing guidelines based on stoneage science. The thermal-only paradigm of RF health effects is over, dead, finito. If your relatives, or you, have a cordless DECT phone, a wi-fi router or live within the beam of greatest intensity of a cellphone tower - then you are subject to "excessive RF exposure" 24/7. Question is, how long will your body cope with the stress. My advice: offset the long-term damage by replenishing your bodies calium and anti-oxidants if you are exposed to non-stop RF exposure - especially pulsed RF.
