Back in the Dark Ages of 40-odd years ago, when I studied Computer Science, I can remember that as well as the more widely discussed, and used, Relational Databases, we did also briefly touch on Hierarchical Databases -- which would seem to be very close to what Salesforce is attempting to patent.

I'd suggest that the likelihood of Prior Art not existing for this idea is zero.

This may be relevant:

The plan also calls for the owners association to have a voice in the sale of Fisker’s intellectual property, which includes the designs and computer code that were necessary to build and operate the vehicles. The owners need long-term access to Fisker’s “cloud software,” which is crucial for sending over-the-air updates to the vehicle software that controls the Ocean.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2024-08-24/fisker-bankruptcy-ocean-car-owners-shareholders-chapter-7-11

Adding video streaming will only add to the company's expenses (probably significantly). It's audience is too small to generate additional video revenue that comes even close to compensating for this. The result will be even quicker bankruptcy.

'Profit through Bankruptcy' -- the Trump money-making strategy.

Granted, that is pretty damn concentrated.

Particularly for sucralose, which is 600x as sweet as sugar. 1mg/ml would be sickly sweet. I generally use 0.1mg/ml in making my own sugar-free cordials (I'm diabetic).

! emphatically agree.

I would note that Tyson's suggestion was "weight of evidence", not "science". Science is not the only discipline based upon "weight of evidence", so are a wide range of other fields, including engineering, logistics, and (one would hope) the more grounded and less speculative areas of such fields as economics and Guhin's own sociology.

What is the alternative to basing decisions on weight of evidence? Basing them on wishful thinking?