That is awesome to see.

I didn't even know.

What about Alien Legacy?

That is what is really the reason, in my opinion. They made enough off of their BJ work that they could afford to take high level risks without losing their house (literally) and they didn't need investors so they would own all of the rights to their products.

There are tons of people who are great programmers or have good ideas that don't bother because they need to work day-to-day to pay their bills and make sure their family has food on the table.

I saw this and the only thing I could think was, maybe we will see some Space Quest again in the style of Space Quest IV or II – funny, and not just playing with technology. Or King's Quest in the style of IV or V, and not the bastardization of VII.

Or hell, a remake of Alien Legacy.... That I would pay be bucks for.

I know that large game development firms simply cannot bother with these projects because the demand and return is too low, but if there is enough devoted fans, maybe, just maybe, my son will be able to play and enjoy the awesomeness of games that have a clear and exciting story that doesn't revolve around shooting people.

Seems to me it's a little like the pot calling the kettle black. Yes, Jobs liked his closed-platform and saw computers and other gadgets as "appliances" to sell to people in closed boxes where you can't even change the battery. But he never said he was doing anything different, and he was very successful at it. In the end, his legacy will include his personal treatment of people, the "culture" he inspired, and the commoditization of computer-related technology.

The part RMS never seemed to understand is that not everyone views software as some kind of grail to protect. I do see his point, but most people don't, and if they did, most wouldn't care. It is a conspicuously self-centered and unyielding technologist's view of the universe.

And so I think it's a little silly to see a man who has contributed little more than his opinions to the world, maligning the reputation of a much more successful man. He may not be wrong, but who cares? Just one more opinion.

No, there was no damage. He just locked out the administrative functions for a while.

Let's get real. The fact of the matter is that nobody is breaking into your house and destroying your books.

Actually it is. You buy a book, download it, put it on your Kindle. In purchasing it, you took ownership of your copy. Then they break into your living room...er...Kindle and steal...er...delete your book. Is that not exactly what they are doing?

Next time you go to the kitchen, do a little experiment with the sugar: does it dissolve more easily in hot water, or in cold water? I think you'll find it's the same with CO2. Better find another explanation.

'I was more concerned for the person's life,' Sheriff Dale Williams said.

Bully for the cops, for a change! The guys who are supposed to protect and serve, who get such a bad rap in recent years, were trying to figure out how to pay a bill for a guy who was trying to off himself. Goddamit but that makes me feel good.

You're thinking of BTK. He sent some document or other to the police on a floppy disk (after asking THEM if there would be any way to trace it back to him). The document was written in MS-Word! They just had to pop up File->Document Properties and there was his name: Bob T. Killer (or whatever).

If it's a Word doc, you might consider going through it with a hex editor or doing an ascii dump on it, as your skills allow. New documents sometimes pick up information about the registered owner of the software, the computer, the date/time, etc. PDF files have such metadata as well.

Digital photos often contain EXIF information showing the model of camera, as well as the time and date the photo was taken. The whereabouts of the the owner of a camera of the same model listed might be quickly correlated to the time/date shown in the photos.

All this information is easily removed, but you should be careful to scrub the data itself, along with any devices used to transport it, while keeping your links to the source minimal.

Cheers!

Sorry for the late reply. I got involved with work and life and haven't been to Slashdot in a couple of weeks.

First off, you're welcome. But I think it's a little more organic than you make it out to be. It's not always about people choosing the simplest or cheapest solution, and for untrained ad hoc coders, coding style is an alien concept. That's not to put them down, though. Let me share a little more of what I referred to, since I was one of those inexperienced coders, once upon a time.

I was a Psych major in school and came to computers from the side. Back in the 80's, I had taken a Pascal course in college, and later on taught myself AppleBASIC on an Apple IIe. When that was too slow for what I wanted, I learned Assembly. A few years later I was working in a company that made PC software and someone gave me a copy of QuickBASIC, which compiled to EXE for DOS. I learned a variety of BASIC variants, including the many types of macro languages in Lotus and Microsoft products, as well as writing applications in dBase III. I also learned C, but since I wasn't a developer and was mostly writing tools for my own productivity, I often fell back on QB because the coding and debugging cycles were much shorter.

Eventually I found myself working in the Desktop IT department (the company was growing from a "startup" to a rather large company, and transfers were frequent) and was tapped to install Lotus Notes for the Prod Dev dept. Having also written product manuals and help files, I was fascinated by the notion of hypertext. My first "hypertext document" was a Windows help file, combining various departmental info, the company phone list, and a map of the facilities. The director of the Application IT department (that managed the Oracle apps) saw this and got me transferred to help create our first intranet. This was when the web was just going mainstream and some people were really trying to exploit it, while others thought it was just a toy.

I built a lot of discussion boards, phone directory searches, and departmental templates with my rudimentary HTML and Perl knowledge. Professional coders would have built a better product, but management didn't want the pros to take time away from their fancy retail products or their expensive Oracle applications, and no one yet saw the value of contracting a professional coder, so it was me and a couple of friends or nothing at all. Eventually I became quite a solid coder, and I continued to push for management to own some of the systems I had written that they were now relying on.

Well, you know it: it wasn't until after I left that they started to rewrite the intranet. Some would (and did) say that those early efforts were crap and they clearly had to be replaced. I would say that the company got a lot of value out of those early crap efforts, and it made it easier for them to design the cohesive back-end that they eventually went on to build. But here is ultimately the crux of the discussion. Management never owns anything until they need to. Then they come in with a "Calm down, the experts are here now with ALL the answers" attitude that belies the fact that they were forced to respond to something like the original coder leaving.

I've heard plenty of crap hurled at Perl, but when all is said and done, I've seen and worked on plenty of web apps written in ASP, Cold Fusion, PHP, Oracle Apps, or Perl/CGI. Each was replaced by another at some point, and each time the villain was always made out to be the tool and not the tool user. The real cost/benefit analysis would examine utilizing all that working code as part of a rewrite, versus starting from scratch. Sometimes they will consider it. Usually not.

C'est normal. C'est la vie.

Cheers!

>>This is called micro-evolution, and in fact the large majority of Christians have no problem with it.

Actually the large majority of Christians (aka Roman Catholics) have no problem with macro evolution. It's official doctrine. It's based in the ancient Christian belief that the understanding the Universe is one of the best ways of understanding the God who created it. The idea that the workings of the world itself is as much a testament to God's will as the Bible. It's the minority of hardcore evangelicals (who somehow seem to have a strangehold on middle America) who prefer to believe that hard evidence must always give way to their fixed, particular interpretation of scripture.

It gets especially silly when you are a co-op student working for a company for only 4 months specifically to gain the experience needed in the industry.

this is no a proof of anything, (are you an expert of civilisations ? , not the game, hum)
that's bullshit, in france we don't care about this "courriel".

I'm surprised it makes so much noise outside of france.
Dear "anonymous", I don't know if the fact you post as "anonymous" is a fact of anything, but what's your problem with it ? I' don't understand.