Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Provide Links to good articles please (Score 1) 158

"Re-read the post dude. Its is essentially a plea for better information instead of heresay evidence. I have noting against the intent of the author who wrote the piece its just that its so badly written and contains no useful data" "A statistical argument would sway my thoughts(and the EPA's) much more."

I've read it quite well thank you, and I've read many similiar articles. The whole crux of them all simply came down to: "There is not enough evidence, more studies need to be done, but the industry is blocking such moves"

There simply isn't any conclusive data, and peoples lives are at stake. It may not have enough 'data' to your liking, but last time I checked, not too many newspapers publish definitive scientific results of studies, but rather summaries of findings and some statistic like '1 out of 100 bleh people who blah get blah blah and blah'. Unfortunately there are not many findings available because the industry is trying it's best to make sure none are ever reached. More articles like these are needed to increase public awareness of potential risks so that pressure can be applied to make the semiconductor industry cooperate.

But I guess people pushing for it hate money, want to put people out of jobs, and are communists. Did you hear that all those scientists from the 1950's who claimed radiation was harmful were on the KGB payroll?

Slashdot Top Deals

"All we are given is possibilities -- to make ourselves one thing or another." -- Ortega y Gasset

Working...