Comment New keyboard (Score 2) 6
Comment Re: maybe not in all cases (Score 5, Informative) 57
Comment READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE (Score 2) 63
Comment 2.5 million papers per year (Score 1) 254
Comment Re:good riddance. (Score 2) 606
Comment Re: Seems to Be a Pattern of Behavior (Score 1) 384
Comment not an experimental demonstration (Score 5, Informative) 79
Comment Re: There's a question about that at Skeptics (Score 1) 294
Comment Redundant summary is redundant (Score 0) 264
Comment Re:Not much worry with a source build (Score 2) 472
Festo's Drone Dragonfly Takes To the Air 45
Comment HTCondor (Score 1) 99
Comment Re:Sputtering is experimental? (Score 2) 28
Maybe by "experimental technique" they meant "a technique that is used in experiments",
Indeed. It is an "experimental technique" rather than a "theoretical technique" or a "computational technique", say. It's frustrating to read an abstract of a physics paper which sounds like the authors have performed a nifty measurement, only to find that in fact they are proposing an idea, or have performed a simulation, or theoretically analysed the problem. (Don't get me wrong, they're all equally important things, but not the same as performing an experiment). Thus, it's nice to emphasise one's "experimental technique".