You couldn't be more wrong. (Score 1)

RMS also pointed out that this strategy of GPLing libraries instead of LGPLing them only works for libraries that don't already exist in some form or another. It would have made no sense to GPL the C library, someone else would have made one available. Same with GNOME, KDE already exists. If both KDE and GNOME allow no commercial development, what good does that do than hinder the growth of Linux.

Also I have a question: if I contribute code to an LGPLed project, can someone else change to project to GPL without my consent? Honest question, I don't know the answer.