Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Pentagon's Blacklisting of Anthropic Was Unlawful, US Judge Rules (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A US judge ruled on Thursday that the Trump administration broke the law when it designated Anthropic as a supply chain risk earlier this year, finding that the government had unlawfully targeted the AI firm for refusing to comply with defense department demands. “The empty invocation of national security is not a blank check to punish and retaliate against government critics,” Judge Rita Lin said in a 59-page decision.

Lin’s ruling barred the federal agencies named in the lawsuit from enforcing Donald Trump’s order to stop using Anthropic’s tools and overturned the designation of the company as a “supply chain risk” by the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth. The status, usually reserved for foreign firms, would have blocked government agencies from doing business with Anthropic. The case emerged out of a months-long feud between Anthropic and the Pentagon at the start of the year. Anthropic refused to allow the government to use its Claude AI model for fully autonomous lethal weapons or domestic mass surveillance, resulting in Hegseth accusing the company of “arrogance and betrayal”.

Lin put a temporary pause on the government’s punitive measures in March, stating that the government’s actions looked like an attempt to “cripple Anthropic” for exercising its first amendment rights. The ruling this week makes that temporary suspension permanent, although the government may appeal. “We welcome the court’s ruling that this supply chain risk designation was unlawful,” an Anthropic spokesperson said.

Submission + - US sanctions Italian leftwing net infrastructure provider (wewillfreeus.org)

Elektroschock writes: The United States put an Italian hacktivism group providing net infrastructure on a terror list and revoked their domain name. On August 26, 2026, the United States State Department designated Autistici/Inventati a Specially Designated Global Terrorist and placed it on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list.

Submission + - Microsoft deepens Saudi Arabia AI ties despite longstanding privacy concerns (nerds.xyz)

BrianFagioli writes: Microsoft is deepening its AI ties with Saudi Arabia through HUMAIN, a state-backed AI company chaired by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

The partnership could bring HUMAINs Arabic-language ALLAM models into Microsoft Foundry and Microsoft 365 Copilot. HUMAIN engineers will also work alongside Microsoft engineers to help organizations deploy AI systems.

The relationship deserves scrutiny. Human rights groups have previously raised concerns about Microsofts Saudi expansion, including privacy, surveillance, and government access to data.

Microsoft says its technology can meet enterprise and public-sector security and governance requirements. But as the company gets closer to a Saudi state-backed AI operation, questions remain about what happens when those requirements collide with Microsofts privacy and human rights commitments.

Comment Took 7 years but... (Score 1, Insightful) 166

It wasn't 7 years to find the right spot. It was 7 years to realize Texas isn't as accommodating as he hoped, and he can buy off a broke state cheaper than a rich state. Of course, finding enough people to move to the Texan Everglades was easy compared to finding enough who will live in the bayous to run his steel penis rocket facilities.

Comment I'm Not Anti-AI (Score 5, Interesting) 49

I use AI daily to write code ... a lot. And I love the technology.

However ... the narrative that "AI makes things better" is increasingly looking like an (industry-motivated) myth to me.

Pros: I can write code faster and easier (and generate diagrams and poorly-written English text). That *is* nice.

Cons: AI is adding adding trillions of gallons of greenhouse gases to a planet that is already starting to die (plus all the other costs of data centers). We're making all other electronics more expensive, slowing the pace of all other tech development. We're losing our ability to read and write (both code and English), our ability to assess academic achievement, and our ability to monetize the web (in a sustainable way).

Honestly, despite being very pro AI, I do question whether its benefits actually outweigh its costs.

Comment Re:Removing it will never be (Score 3, Interesting) 44

I work at a robotics company. While I personally have no robotics background, I've had several conversations with a wide variety of "robot people" about the specific question "what is a robot?" It turns out it's not a simple question where everyone agrees on the answer.

But in all those conversations, with all those people (who make robots for a living) ... no one has ever proposed "must make decisions on their own" as a prerequisite for being a robot.

Comment Re:Tower dump in Mississippi (Score 4, Informative) 63

Law enforcement doesn't care about your rights, only about catching criminals. They wanted to be able to say to a cellphone company "tell me everyone whose cellphone was within range of these three towers (ie. everyone in a particular location) to catch some criminals".

The judge said "hell no! This is America, we have the 4th amendment, and the highest court in the land said it still applies in 2026: you can't just ask for everyone in an area, because you're effectively 'searching' tons of innocent people to find a criminal, and that's exactly what the 4th says you can't do."

Comment Re:Meaningless statements? (Score 5, Insightful) 219

He's saying "do you want robot cars to be as good as humans, or safer?"

If the goal is just "as good as a human" then (in theory) we have "proof of concept" that that can be achieved (humans drive cars all the time) ...

... but, humans also get in accidents all the time. If the goal of self-driving cars is to do *better* than the humans, stopping at what humans can achieve (with "cameras (eyes) only"), safety-wise, isn't good enough. If you want "safer than human", as Google evidently does, you need LIDAR.

Comment Why Is No One Noticing ... (Score 1) 57

It's 2026, and a significant news story amounts to "CEO told employees to do what's good for the business".

If you had told me in 2025, 2024, etc. that a headline-worthy event would be a CEO saying the most obvious thing in the world ("do what's good for the business") I never would have believed you.

Comment Re:ASIMOV? (Score 1) 35

I mean, that's certainly one take on his stories.

Another would be that for thousands and thousands of years (in his universe) the laws of robotics not only worked great, they were the entire foundation for a pivotal technology (robots). That technology was in turn essential for letting an entire civilization colonize countless planets.

Without the laws of robotics, humanity would still be stuck on a single planet.

Slashdot Top Deals

Often statistics are used as a drunken man uses lampposts -- for support rather than illumination.

Working...