No really, inductively actuated mechanism. Similar systems have been patented 20 years ago. This is no new news, just a willingness to invest into the technology and having customers to pay the cost.

Let both parties speak in their natural language and use AI to translate.

Thailand uses 80x, not Asia. The second country is an unlabelled European country.

Medicine is applying pre-existing solutions, not formulating theories and testing them. Insurance companies wouldn't allow it. This is why learning models are so helpful in this area. Diagnostic tests are cheap relative to an actual doctor. MD-PhD's are a different story, but the average patient is seeing an average doctor. Average doctors are very average at their job.

and it's ripe for AI intervention. I work in medical diagnostics and I've been telling folks for years that AI will have the biggest impact augmenting doctors and nurses. What I've realized is that your average doctor is just that, average. In some areas AI is better, others it's worse. By bringing down the cost of testing, we can essentially replace many early stage medical professionals and achieve much better outcomes.

Yeah they are definitely going to mine the data to AI models.

The build plate calls for the temp. controller as part of the build plate. All modern 3D printers have the PID controller on the control board, not the build platform. As for purge tower patent, it calls for multiple print heads, mainly IDEX. The load cells are called for being part of the print head, not the bed. So, I think the industry in large is safe from those patents. The image analysis one is absent on how the machine vision functions, so that won't survive. The RFID is the tricky. I don't think as big of a deal as the news is making out

I switched to a toothpaste with hydroxyapatite instead of fluoride and and my mild age related sensitivities have vanished in a matter of a few weeks. Even my kid said their teeth felt stronger and less sensitive.

We already have cop cars with onboard, unattended radar that takes a picture. Sorry Ford, it's obvious.

Many patent apps are slapping a generic "performed by AI" step in they patents without sufficiently describing how the AI model is structured, trained, how the training data formatted/annotated, etc. I can't speak for other jurisdictions, but these types of patents would not be enforceable in the US (the grand bargain is you get a temporary monopoly for sharing how to make the invention in sufficient detail).

Look at the hierarchical structure of a corporation, it mimics modern neural networks.

It's been proven time and time again that it's cheaper to provide free lunches to any one than it is to bill children individually. Also, properly fed student behave better in class.

"Is the order on the screen correct? Please confirm." Fixed.

Sure this seems like a good thing, but Google is going to install digital signage along all these routes to sell ads.

Seems like an obvious solution.