Comment Re:how does it compare to mandrake? (Score 1) 429
Once upon a time I started out with SuSE v6, 7 and 8, and I was quite happy with it, but then they sold out to Novell (which i don't trust).
At the same time I tried RH8 and 9 and eventually Fedora Core 1, which impressed me quite a lot, but .. alas, I couldn't run on our new Dell Dimension 8300 PC's with SATA-disk, ATI Radeon cards and so on.
So - a friend of mine pointed out, that Mandrake 9.2 could do the trick - running the above mentioned machines - and at the same time, I was impressed with Mandrake's easy way of installing.
I was fooled by the community version of Mandrake 10, which - IMHO - contains a lot of errors and cannot run scanners, digital cameras and a lot of other things, that v9.2 could.
So .. I'll give Fedora Core 2 another chance, since the first version was fine, but not up to the new cards and disks ..
Right now I'm waiting for Bittorrent to give med access to the new wonder-distribution!
At the same time I tried RH8 and 9 and eventually Fedora Core 1, which impressed me quite a lot, but
So - a friend of mine pointed out, that Mandrake 9.2 could do the trick - running the above mentioned machines - and at the same time, I was impressed with Mandrake's easy way of installing.
I was fooled by the community version of Mandrake 10, which - IMHO - contains a lot of errors and cannot run scanners, digital cameras and a lot of other things, that v9.2 could.
So
Right now I'm waiting for Bittorrent to give med access to the new wonder-distribution!
