As a dutch native, I can say that the wording was typically weasel wording.
Especially the part where the minister, who only a few months ago was openly complaining about encryption, now says in the conclusion part of the official document:
> Derhalve is het kabinet van mening dat het op dit moment niet wenselijk is om beperkende wettelijke maatregelen te nemen ten aanzien van de ontwikkeling, de beschikbaarheid en het gebruik van encryptie binnen Nederland.
Translation: Therefore, the government believes that it is _currently_ not appropriate to take restrictive legal measures against the development, availability and use of encryption within the Netherlands.
The translation was done by Google, and seems to be very adequate, please zoom in on the wording "currently". If that's the conclusion, I wouldn't call it "strong" wording at all, which Slashdot says the minister used. Building in backdoors isn't time related, or currently not a good idea -- it's inherently bad, not just today.