From this article: http://www.forbes.com/sites/petergleick/2012/01/27/remarkable-editorial-bias-on-climate-science-at-the-wall-street-journal/
"But the most amazing and telling evidence of the bias of the Wall Street Journal in this field is the fact that 255 members of the United States National Academy of Sciences wrote a comparable (but scientifically accurate) essay on the realities of climate change and on the need for improved and serious public debate around the issue, offered it to the Wall Street Journal, and were turned down."

I disagree with both of you.

Not all of them.

If by hunted you mean questioned, you are correct. Beaten? Not even a possibility. Not all believers are nut cases, but they all plead the case that the nuts are somewhat right.