Comment Damn you automatic name resolution! (Score 1) 333
Submission + - Microsoft shows off universal translator (extremetech.com)
Journal Journal: Science vs. superstition in Louisiana, again 2
You have to read carefully to understand what's really being debated here. Short version: in 2008, Louisiana passed a law which more or less mandated the teaching of creationism, Luddism, and denialism, and now they're trying to repeal it. I don't know enough about the current state of LA politics to know if the repeal effort has a prayer (hah!) of succeeding, but I wish the best of luck to Sen. Peterson, Mr. Ko
Submission + - Bacteria-Killing Viruses Wield an Iron Spike (sciencemag.org)
Comment grandiose luster? (Score 1) 241
As it is written, my reflex is to discount the entire post as biased crap.
Comment Title says "Less", Article says "Comparable" (Score 1) 225
Comment Re:Best Part (Score 1) 174
Some intruders download Windows service packs to check the bandwidth available.
Comment Re:Won't someone please think of the children (Score 1) 256
You said
"HTTPS only works one IP per host, so that gives a positive track to where they were going."
That is not correct. If you inspect HTTPS traffic you'll see that clients issue something like the following:
CONNECT www.myawesomehost.net:443 HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5
Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Host: www.myawesomehost.net
The same IP address can host www.myawesomehost.net and plenty of other Web sites. With HTTPS the Feds would just track the CONNECT and Host: fields since those are in the clear.
Comment Re:Thanks! (Score 1) 216
"I know the book has pissed some people off, especially when I take on their particular sacred cows (e.g., intrusion detection)."
"Sacred cows" have nothing to do with it. The book just isn't that interesting.
Pakistan Used Google Earth For Military Targeting 111
Comment Re:Put your personal agenda on the shelf (Score 1) 149
Granted it would be a mistake to elevate this above the task of actually getting the job done, but I see no shame in promoting OSS as a matter of policy provided there are no overriding practical considerations.
My point exactly. Anyone making recommendations with any sort of bias blinders on, whether is be (corruption) getting paid off by a corporate entity or personal agenda (being an OSS zealot), is inherently not to be trusted. Getting the job done is the key. In the best way, for the least money, and serving the public good. The OP suggested that he wanted to convince the powers that be that OSS was the way. The absense of any other reasoning suggests that he may have a personal agenda that is clouding his judgement. It is not and should not be OSS vs. Commercial software. It should be solution A vs solution B. With all the aspects of those solutions taken into consideration. If solution B is OSS, perhaps it gets a +1. But OSS is merely one of the factors, not all of them.