As Intel is on 14nm and AMD on 7nm, once Intel is on 7nm as well, the tide will not sway back to Intel? This never seems to come up in analysis, is it irrelevant? What if we can get any smaller by hitting a brick wall on die size?

Is this 1.5 GB of slower memory have value to Developers from the beginning, or only after developers have difficulty squeezing performance and game size into the primary memory?

I am confused. During emissions tests don't they stick a sensor down the exhaust pipe and making readings from there? if this is still the case what happened here? 1. The software interpreting the sensor (neither the software or the sensor attached to car) was written by these colluding car companies OR 2. The software is in the car itself and no external sensor is involved, and then the software is controlled by the colluding car companies. Either 1 or 2 being the truth: how on earth did no one see the opportunity for corruption? I know nothing. Chris

I am reminded of Netflix. The company started out mailing DVDs to homes, they knew the technology and ecosystems would evolve to allow them to stream directly to TVs, but they started with mailing, this is why they called it Netflix and not MailFlix.

The summary posted mentions crop rotation but the article itself does not mention it. Thankfully using AI to perform crop rotation is not in the article. Imagine an AI telling us to rotate to different crops on the same land, I think we figured this out hundreds of years ago by illiterate farmers ( don't mean to disparage farmers, high kudos to all farmers, only trying to stress the point of dumbing down of modern society and losing our knowledge which used to be common sense and now thinking only AI could tell us how to farm properly)