Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Warning Future Generations (Score 1) 616

This post reminds me of a discussion in an Anthropology class from a number of years ago.

Our Lecturer was explaining ethnographic writing, and a study undertaken on warning future Anthropologists, who may have uncovered a mysterious archaeological site (which happened to be one of our longterm nuclear storage locations, and entering posed a danger to their immediate health). :)

The study looked at finding a universal sign or signal for danger, which could basically be posed on the door of places like Yucca Mountain (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca_Mountain ). The symbol needed to be relatively static over time and uniform across as many cultures as possible. Not too surprisingly, they were unable to find anything suitable. The safest solution was to employ a 'gate-keeper' of this knowledge. It is the gate-keepers responsibility to pass on the significance of exactly what this 'stuff' buried here is. Or just mark them all on Google Maps. :)

I hope this makes sense, it's getting a bit late here!

hads.

Science

Inhabited Island Vanishes Forever Underwater 408

PhreakOfTime writes "For the first time the rising ocean levels have washed away an inhabited island. Lohachara island was at one point home to some 10,000 people. It, along with several other spits of land near the Indian mainland, is now permanently underwater. From the article: ' As the seas continue to swell, they will swallow whole island nations, from the Maldives to the Marshall Islands, inundate vast areas of countries from Bangladesh to Egypt, and submerge parts of scores of coastal cities. Eight years ago ... the first uninhabited islands - in the Pacific atoll nation of Kiribati - vanished beneath the waves. The people of low-lying islands in Vanuatu, also in the Pacific, have been evacuated as a precaution, but the land still juts above the sea. The disappearance of Lohachara, once home to 10,000 people, is unprecedented.'"

The Daily Show as Substantive as Broadcast News 669

Walter C. writes "Anyone who watches the evening news with any regularity knows that it's not a bastion of substance. However, a new study conducted by researchers at Indiana University reports that The Daily Show has just as much substance to it as the broadcast news. 'The researchers looked at coverage of the 2004 Democratic and Republican national conventions and the first presidential debate of the fall campaign, all of which were covered by the mainstream broadcast news outlets and The Daily Show... There was just as much substance to The Daily Show's coverage as there was on the network news. And The Daily Show was much funnier, with less of the hype — references to photo ops, political endorsements, and polls — that typically overshadows substantive coverage on network news, according to the study.'"
User Journal

Journal Journal: nothing really

This will go down on my permanent record aye. I'm basically just testing out the journal. Hey, even HTML tags, awesome.

Slashdot Top Deals

Marriage is the sole cause of divorce.

Working...