Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Warren says not to pay 4 people who already paid (Score 1) 67

What about Warren? She said that anyone who busted their butt to pay for college should not be reimbursed and anyone who ran up huge debt should. Sounds similar to me. If NY already has a plan, let them go do it. Let's pay to get new programs off the ground and get to the real rural areas that are not being serviced.

Comment YAY! It should go down in flames (Score 1) 422

If a doctor doing tele-surgery on a child over the internet isn't more important than the next season of "13 ways I killed myself" then I don't know what you guys are smokin'. Up to this point I haven't seen widespread blocking of applications based on data. Maybe based on security, but not data and if AT&T wants to not ding me for Directv content, then so be it. The others can still use the pipes. If I go to T-Mobile I can watch unlimited YouTube.
Image

Corporations Hiring Hooky Hunters 610

No longer satisfied with your crinkled doctor's note, a growing number of corporations are hiring "Hooky Detectives." Private investigator Rick Raymond says he's staked out bowling alleys, pro football games, weddings and even funerals looking for people using sick days. From the article: "Such techniques have become permissible at a time when workers are more likely to play hooky. Kronos, a workforce productivity firm in Chelmsford, Mass., recently found that 57 percent of salaried employees take sick days when they're not sick — almost a 20 percent increase from statistics gathered between 2006 and 2008."

Poll Says No Voter Support for Net Neutrality 337

Giants2.0 writes "A survey conducted by the Commerce Committee says that Americans don't know what net neutrality is, and they don't want it. Ars Technica reports that only 7% of respondents had ever heard of net neutrality, but the report questions the fairness of the survey, which was crafted by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation to assess support for the current version of the Telecommunications Act of 2006. The survey suggested to respondents that net neutrality would prevent ISPs from selling faster service or security products, both of which are not true." From the article: "The very brief net neutrality description used by the pollsters is somewhat misleading insofar as it suggests that net neutrality would bar Internet Service Providers from selling faster service than is available today. Strict net neutrality does not concern itself with ultimate transfer speeds available to subscribers, but instead focuses on how different kinds of Internet traffic could be shaped by ISPs for anti-competitive purposes. For instance, strict net neutrality would not prevent an ISP from selling extremely fast 35Mbps connections, but it would prevent ISPs from privileging traffic for their own services for competitive advantage, or degrading the traffic of competing services."

Slashdot Top Deals

What this country needs is a good five cent microcomputer.

Working...