Benefits of doing this simulation (Score 2)

We can acquire much beneficial information from doing this 3D thermo-nuclear simulation. A solution to a secondary explosion shares a lot of similarities to the implosion of a nuclear fusion pellet as proposed for future Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) power reactors. The fundamental physics such as radiation, electromagnetism, and rapid condensation are probably identical. Since the National Ignition Facility (NIF) [a big laser at Livermore designed to ignite a fusion pellet] is still under construction, there isn't a lot of ICF pellet data that folks can use to verify the computational models. However, there certainly should be lots of data that can be compared against for bomb physics. The resulting benefit for all human kind is that we can do less testing and more computer modelling if the models prove they can simulate the physics correctly. Many of the models can also apply to less extreme conditions such as next-gen propulsion systems, hypersonic structural design and atmospheric re-entry. I guess I'd try to educate myself more about the fundamental science and benefits before I'd pass cynical judgment upon the use of this much CPU/hardware. Our future, non-CO2 producing power supply may depend on this research.