Comment Re:While you're at it... (Score 1) 109
Comment Self-censorship (Score 4, Insightful) 512
Comment Sets a precedent (Score 5, Insightful) 589
Comment Re:Thunderbolt (Score 3, Insightful) 355
Comment Changes nothing (Score 2) 203
Comment Re:no wonder apple dropped 16GB machines (Score 2) 216
Comment Burn to M-Disc (Score 3, Informative) 268
Comment What does their website run on? (Score 5, Informative) 68
Comment Re:SlingBox (Score 1) 484
Comment Re:Wrong decision (Score 1) 484
Comment Re:My experiences don't line up with this at all.. (Score 1) 329
Comment Re:good (Score 1) 350
Comment Autonomous weapons could be good (Score 1) 180
In a ground combat scenario, autonomous weapons could be a good thing. Right now, soldiers are tasked with protect others as well as themselves, and in most situations the safest resolution is to kill the antagonist. A machine or robot wouldn't suffer from emotional lapses in judgment (anger, hostility). A robot may have better weapons skills, so instead of a kill shot, may only need to wound. A robot would be more willing to put itself in harms way to protect a living person.
The programming required for such a machine would be incredibly complex, but controllable with defined precision. A human soldier can't be controlled or programmed, and history shows that humans make a lot of bad decisions when it comes to the use of deadly force.