Is Kingston telling the whole truth ? (Score 1)

David Sun's posting at Kingston Tech claims:

• SUN claims that their patents cover standard PC memory.
• SUN misled the USPTO by not disclosing prior art

However SUN's first patent (1991) is on a particular design and refers to previous patents on SIMMs the earlist of which is dated 6/1986.

Apparently, Kingston originally licensed SUN's designs and it is the newer ones that they have not licensed.

I don't think this is quite so simple as some people are suggesting.